|
Paid 'ads' for song plays revive payola memories
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/front/2621567
June 11, 2004, 10:39AM
Paid 'ads' for song plays revive payola memories
By JEFF LEEDS
Los Angeles Times
During a single week in May, Canadian pop rocker Avril Lavigne's new song Don't Tell Me aired no fewer than 109 times on Nashville radio station WQZQ-FM.
The heaviest rotation came between midnight and 6 a.m., an on-air no man's land visited largely by insomniacs, truckers and graveyard shift workers. On one Sunday morning, the three-minute, 24-second song aired 18 times, sometimes as little as 11 minutes apart.
Those plays, or "spins," helped Don't Tell Me vault into the elite top 10 on Billboard magazine's national pop radio chart, which radio program directors across the country use to spot hot new tunes.
But what many chart watchers may not know is that the predawn saturation in Nashville — and elsewhere — occurred largely because Arista Records paid the station to play the song as an advertisement. In all, sources said, WQZQ aired Don't Tell Me as an ad at least 40 times the week ending May 23, accounting for more than one-third of the song's airplay on the station.
The Don't Tell Me campaign is part of the latest craze in record promotion, a high-pressure part of the music business in which the labels try to influence which songs reach the air.
In the late 1950s, rock's earliest days, the industry was hit by a series of payola scandals in which cash bribes were paid to disc jockeys who agreed to play certain songs. That practice was subsequently outlawed, prompting record companies to find more subtle means of currying favor with radio programmers, such as free junkets and concert tickets.
In the latest twist, it's the radio stations themselves that have been reaching out to the labels, offering to play songs in the form of ads, often in the early morning hours when there tends to be an excess inventory of airtime. The practice is legal as long as the station makes an on-air disclosure of the label's sponsorship — typically with an introduction such as "And now, Avril Lavigne's Don't Tell Me, presented by Arista Records."
To be sure, Don't Tell Me is a bona fide hit, even without spins being bought and paid for. Radio stations must play a song many thousands of times for it to crack the Billboard top 10. Nonetheless, a few hundred spins here and there can move a song up a place or two in the rankings — and ensure that it is climbing rather than falling on the charts.
Playing songs as advertising makes "the chart unreliable," said Garett Michaels, program director of San Diego rock station KBZT-FM. "Basically, the radio station isn't playing a song because they believe in it. They're playing it because they're being paid."
All five major record corporations have at least dabbled in the sales programs, industry sources said, with some reportedly paying as much as $60,000 in advertising fees to promote a single song.
Interscope Records has purchased spins for the Black Eyed Peas' song Hey Mama in recent weeks, as well as for Sheryl Crow's The First Cut Is the Deepest and Sugababes' Hole in the Head, sources said. Virgin Records has bought advertising time for rock band A Perfect Circle. Lava Records has purchased airplay for singer Cherie, and V2 Records has done the same for Katy Rose.
Representatives for the record labels declined to comment.
But one label executive who has purchased airplay, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the idea was clearly to prop up songs long enough for them to attract genuine fans.
"In our business, perception is reality," he said. "The minute you're down in spins, these program directors drop the record."
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
ZaneZann
|
Date: June 11, 2004 @ 10:09 PM
Radiostations just plain suck nowadays. |
|
ZaneZann
|
Date: June 11, 2004 @ 10:09 PM
Radiostations just plain suck nowadays. |
|
Lachatte
|
Date: June 11, 2004 @ 10:31 PM
You can say that again, ZaneZane. |
|
stilltrying
|
Date: June 11, 2004 @ 10:51 PM
This is nothing more than BRAINWASHING the public (sheep) into buying a product (unit) With this kind of consent exposer you could sell Avril farting into a mic. Which Leads me to the question I've ask once again Hey major labels If your artists are sooooo great WHY do you have to PAY to get them PLAYED????????? |
|
ZaneZann
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 2:56 AM
It is such a horrible system in its current state. Little variety, some talent, massive over-playing of songs : Why is it this way? :(
I really hate how filesharing is the scapegoat for all thier problems. They fire people and blame filesharing. They never mention the boycott. |
|
tasadar24
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 3:13 AM
Why do you think I don't even pay attention to new American music anymore? Because I choose to listen to whatever oldies or Japanese music I want to listen to. Nobody tells me "so and so is a hit", I choose what I like and it's not influenced at all by commercials so HAH.
felt like saying that for some reason >_>, forgot what it was. |
|
ZaneZann
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 1:56 PM
Oldies are well, old. What Japanese music do you speak of?
I tend to find music I like through filesharing. Usually it is because of a song listed to the wrong band. After I listen to it I know it is someone else and I find out who they are and viola. |
|
darkened03
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 3:03 PM
and we wonder why radio sucks balls |
|
stilltrying
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 11:28 PM
We Pay We Pay Thats how we get our PLAY !!!!!!! |
|
FrenchToast3000
|
Date: June 12, 2004 @ 11:35 PM
Does anyone listen to the radio anymore? What's a radio?
Seriously, the best part of this article is in the 6th paragraph, where we are led to believe that payola actually ever did stop. News Flash: It didn't. It just came right back disguised as "independant marking". Instead of paying money directly to radio for play, they skipped all that and gave it to independant marketing companies to bribe Billboard reporters for top positions on Billboard charts. I know this because I used to do it. And believe me it was a lot more effective in influencing radio play and chart numbers than "free junkets and concert tickets". |
|
goldenpi
|
Date: June 13, 2004 @ 8:26 AM
I only listen to radio four. No music. Good station through. www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/ if you want to check it out. |
|
Bufo
|
Date: June 14, 2004 @ 1:52 PM
"Basically, the radio station isn't playing a song because they believe in it. They're playing it because they're being paid."
Very true. These kind of statements need to be publicized more. But it does beg an interesting question: what criteria should radio stations use in deciding what songs to play if money is not involved? Should we give all the power to the radio DJ? Are most radio DJ's qualified to pick out "good" music from "bad" music (whatever that means)?
Payola may not be so unfair if smaller labels (and even independents) can also play the game by paying for certain songs 'a-la-carte'. After all, if radio stations can charge for direct advertising, why not let them charge to play songs and get this payola practice out in the open?
Long term, though, what we really need are more radio outlets. Then the price of broadcasting music will come down. |
|
INeedAlover
|
Date: June 15, 2004 @ 9:38 AM
Simple Solution:
The charts should NOT count spins from Midnight to 6am Mon-Fri, when this PHONY advertising occurs. |
|
Lachatte
|
Date: June 15, 2004 @ 8:37 PM
Exactly, lover. They know what's going on. Billboard is in on the game. And it's profitable. |
|
|