Username:
Password:






 
Lip Sync Blues
Posted by Tom Barger on November 2, 2004 at 7:30 AM   (printer friendly)

In Concert, but Not Live

By Sean Daly

Joel Hamilton believes now is the perfect time for you pop-music fans to get a grip on reality. Your favorite singer just may be cheating on you.

Hamilton, a veteran music producer and sound engineer, doesn't think anyone should have been shocked by singer Ashlee Simpson's fakery on "Saturday Night Live" last week.

In fact, he says, instead of blaming her band or acute acid reflux disease for her performance-enhancement needs, Simpson should have simply told the truth.

"Backing tracks have been around as long as there have been tracks," says Hamilton, who works out of Studio G in Brooklyn, N.Y., and has been twiddling the knobs for both indie-rock upstarts and major-label heavyweights for more than 10 years.

Backing tracks -- that is, prerecorded tracks, either with or without vocals, that can help an artist better re-create an album performance -- can be used in different ways. Those venerable acts on "American Bandstand" were lip-syncing: mouthing along to their songs. Pink Floyd has used prerecorded tracks to add sonic rumble to its trippy concert shtick. And Madonna has used "guide vocals" -- prerecorded vocal tracks that a pop star can sing over to add oomph to her performance -- so she can dance, dance, dance and not sound winded.

Hip-hop acts and rappers employ prerecorded tracks all the time at "track dates," live events where someone, usually a DJ, provides everything but the vocal. "I'm not sure why people are more accepting if the guy [playing the tracks] is right out in front," Hamilton says.

He's also not sure what Simpson was up to -- whether it was straight-up lip-syncing or a guide-vocal situation. Besides, he says, there's a much bigger secret to be divulged from the "SNL" slip-up anyway.

Thanks to relatively recent advances in digital processing, using prerecorded tracks is merely one of myriad tricks that musicians from Britney Spears to Aerosmith to U2 rely on to give live performances the same slick sheen as their albums. Much of the digital derring-do that used to be accomplished in recording studios -- vocal tuning, cutting and pasting guitar licks, adding multitrack layering -- can now be done onstage.

"There's a surreal, cartoonesque perfection that people expect today," Hamilton says. "Everything is being manipulated."

Hamilton should know: He and his peers are the ones doing the manipulating. A computer-literate sound engineer has become a must for any musician or band today -- especially a band whose singer has trouble hitting, and holding, certain notes. Pitch correction, real-time processing and harmony generation don't sound very rock-and-roll, but Britney Spears, Cher, even art-rockers Radiohead would sound lousy -- or, depending or your tastes, lousier -- without the computer-based help.

"The analogy would be airbrushing," says Hamilton. "It's the same thing as in Playboy."

Performance-enhancement for pop stars, especially on a high-tech scale, is a relatively new trend. In 1997, Antares Audio Technologies -- a godsend to some, the death of authentic music to others -- developed revolutionary pitch-correction software called Auto-Tune, which allows a sound technician to smooth out a singer's voice, no matter how wobbly or screechy or off-key that voice may be. Just punch the desired key of a song into the computer, and the gizmo will adjust the pitch to the closest note in that key.

Auto-tuning, which is now being used onstage as well, did nothing less than change how pop music is made.

How powerful are Auto-Tune and PitchDoctor and similar software? Let's just say that if those ill-fated charlatans Milli Vanilli -- the '80s duo who became synonymous with lip-syncing and having someone else sing their vocals -- were around today, they might still be mouthing the words during shows, but they'd be mouthing the words to songs they actually performed in the studio.

Yes, pitch correction is a miracle drug. Bob Dylan and Tom Waits, musical icons whose careers are based on gargly vocals, have no use for it. But many other stars do.

"Take someone like Whitney Houston, for instance," says Ben Mellott, who operates the Nothing but Noise recording studio in Fairfax. "It's easy for her to drift flat or rise too sharp when she's holding a note. Auto-Tune would help her keep in tune."

Use the pitch device too much, however, and vocals can start to sound odd and mechanical, like a singing cyborg -- or Cher on her 1998 hit "Believe."

"I have trouble identifying Britney Spears's voice as a human voice," Mellott says. "I've never heard someone sing like that sitting in a room. But she's not going for realism -- she's going for show."

Roots-rocker Allison Moorer, on the other hand, apparently has different thoughts about auto-tuning. On copies of her 2002 album, "Miss Fortune," a sticker was attached: "Absolutely no vocal tuning or pitch correction was used in the making of this record."

"There's an internal debate in the industry about using this stuff," says Dave O'Donnell, a Grammy-nominated engineer who worked the soundboard for one of the biggest stars of the '80s. (O'Donnell, like all the other engineers interviewed, declined to specify the musicians with whom he's worked.) "But it's been blown out of proportion. It's a sign of the times. If you can fix something, you do. If you listen to old records, not everything's in tune. [These days], people overuse it. They like the perfection, but that just means they're inexperienced."

And the tricks just keep on coming: To further enhance a singer's vocals, sound engineers can use a device called a harmony generator: Just click a mouse and one Britney can suddenly sound like 100 Britneys. To give a band some help, gizmos called trigger pads can be attached to a drum kit and, when struck by the drummer, send signals to a computer. "You can hit the kick drum, for instance, and another sound altogether comes out," says Mellott. "You can play different sounds with each hit."

Guitarists are now equipped with effects pedals that can summon whole orchestras. Even advances in microphone technology can make a singer with a suspect voice sound like Sinatra. (Well, Frank Jr. at least.) "With the right type of mike, you can make a so-so singer sound powerful, and believe me, I've had my share of so-so singers," says Mellott.

The desire for perfection leads us back to Ashlee Simpson. The best way to re-create her studio sound in a live setting might be to run her voice through a processor and have her sing over backing tracks. Simpson "has been made to be something that requires backing tracks to achieve," Hamilton says, adding that the controversy surrounding her "is a weird judgment on something that wasn't supposed to have soul in the first place. That's like complaining about dinner after someone hands you a Snickers bar."

Simpson certainly isn't alone. Because select pop stars rely so heavily on pitch correction in the studio, they've been forced to bring high-tech trickery out on the road with them. And for entertainers whose stage show is even more important than the music, guide vocals are the way to go.

O'Donnell remembers seeing R&B crooner R. Kelly drop his microphone during a live arena performance -- but his vocals just kept on going. "His fans loved it," O'Donnell says. "They didn't care. They want the dancing. They want the show. Plus they knew Kelly really could sing."

"Guide tracks are very common," agrees Mellott. "Let's say Britney Spears is dancing around onstage. You expect her to hit every note when she's jumping around? A CD backup helps her put on a better show. It's what her fans want."

"This is something that has appeared more and more in the last 15, 20 years," Michael Jaworek, concert promoter for the Birchmere in Alexandria, says about all the new onstage technology. "So many artists in the of-the-moment pop realm do it. It seems to be occurring much more frequently."

Jaworek attributes a lot of it to "the cost of doing business." It's cheaper to bring a band in a small black box than a band on a tour bus. "This is why Enya won't tour," he says of the New Age pop star who uses lush orchestration and scores of vocal effects. "She feels she can't [properly] re-create her music live."

In the end, though, a pop singer or a rock band -- whether in the studio or on the stage, whether lip-syncing or using guide vocals -- ultimately has to have at least a smidge of chops.

"There's nothing that re-creates a passionate performance," Hamilton says. "You have to sound like you mean it."

At least for now.


User Comments (These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)

erc1452  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 8:06 AM
**O'Donnell remembers seeing R&B crooner R. Kelly drop his microphone during a live arena performance -- but his vocals just kept on going. "His fans loved it," O'Donnell says. "They didn't care. **

I can just imagine if something like this happened at a heavy metal concert. When the fans realized they were being ripped off - they would probably rush the stage and kill the band, quite literally! Us metal fans want to see our band perform live, and play live, not pretend to play live!

What this whole article comes down to is 1 word: Talent. Either you have it or you dont :)

Jefrystube  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 8:26 AM
Wanted by fans: Talent
Detested by RIAA members: Talent

Talent can't be taken away, a career dependent on technology can. Just another form of control. A tool used by tools to force no-talent tools on the public.

crawdd  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:03 AM
So apparently Milli Vanilli wasn't wrong, just ahead of their time? Gimme a break.

murderswitch  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:04 AM
"A CD backup helps her put on a better show. It's what her fans want."

The fans are idiots.

INeedAlover  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:24 AM
Jefrystube doesn't have it quite right. It's the KIND of talent wanted.

Wanted by fans: Musical Talent (Write, perform and sing your own music live)

Wanted by RIAA: Pop Talent (Be able to dance, smile, show your big breasts, and lip synch well). And most importantly LOOK GOOD.

pianotex  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:25 AM
The level of true talent in today's popular music continues to sink. Unfortunately as more computer generated vocal and instrumental assistance is put into use in live performances, the bar of perfection in concerts will continue to rise, leaving it mandatory that all bands use these methods, regardless of how good they can sound without these effects.

hamjay711  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:59 AM
You guys are just too critical of musicians. They work almost year round, between tours and writing/producing music, to provide for fans. If they couldn't use backing tracks or lipsync, imagine how many tour dates would be cancelled due to a sore throat or other voice related problems. True, the quality of music has been of poor nature as of late, but you can't point the finger at artists, it is the labels that push artists like kids in sweatshops to produce music.

compmore  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 10:34 AM
You guys are just too critical of musicians.

musicians play insterments. Any of these pop singers play insterments? there wouldn't be many cancelations. in the 60's and 70's many a band played concerts in adverse conditions and did quite well. REAL musicians and singers are pros and perform beautifully. like a ball player who plays with a broken ankle, the music and fans is what most important. just because they don't sound like their homoginized CD's when they're live doesn't mean they're not good.

gdZiemann  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 11:04 AM
You can polish a turd, but it will still smell if you get too close.

jsk2001  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 11:15 AM
Well according to the 60 minutes special on SNL, the executive producer i think that's his title said there has never been lip synching on the show unless it involved aggressive dance moves. He had no idea that she was planning on doing what she did.

The show has years of history and she just doesn't really give a damn. She walks off stage during a "performance". What gives Ashlee Simpson the right to take all that away?

MasterofChaos  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 11:17 AM
That's all this crap is, just a very fancy brand of turd polish. And man, these days, aren't those turds lookin' mighty shiny!

wet1  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 11:40 AM
The fans plop down 80 bucks to see a concert. This concert is supposed to be music and a singer.

Music is supposed to be played by artists who have the talent to replay what they played before. No one said at any point that it had to sound just like the album. That is why they have studio recordings.

If you get live it is aways different than the stage show. If it isn't; if it sounds just like the cd, you got ripped off. I don't have to spend that kind of money to hear the artist, heck go buy the cd if that is what you want to hear.

Musicans have to have talent to produce music. If they don't have talent then they aren't musicans. Musicans don't get talent overnight. Takes years to develop properly, same with singers.

Doesn't take years to learn dance steps that are choregraphed. So are you paying the money to watch dance steps or are you paying the money to see a band preform their music live?

It isn't realistic to expect a band to sound just like they do in the studio where they have all sorts of equipment to make the group sound different and can massage the sound into anything desired.

Musicans have good days and bad days. There are days when you just can't hit the lick or note. Days when it doesn't go together at all. Part of it.

Sorry, I feel ripped off if I pay to see a group and then find out they aren't really singing at all. I don't care if it doesn't sound just like the album. Isn't what I came to see. I come to hear that talent and see the group perform the music they play. If I didn't get that then it was a waste.

No wonder the majors have so much trouble with repeat ablums from groups now-a-days. It isn't any wonder that great "must have" albums aren't being produced anymore.

JohnCarlton02  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 11:56 AM
"REAL musicians and singers are pros and perform beautifully. like a ball player who plays with a broken ankle, the music and fans is what most important."

compmore,
FYI Kurt Schilling was pitching for a $15 million bonus on that broken ankle. It wasn't for love of the game or fans, it was for pure $$$ (not that I blame him).

compmore  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 12:20 PM
true johncarlton. I guess I remember the good ol days of sports.

INeedAlover  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 1:48 PM
Funny, isn't that why Ashlee Simpson was performing as often as she can and for SNL? Money... exposure that leads to more MONEY. Does she really have a love for music like many musicians in the "good ol days" of music? I would say not likely.

I agree that I didn't pay money to see a CD played. I paid to see an artist perform. It's not THAT important that it sounds EXACTLY like the CD. In fact, many musicians get bored playing their songs over and over, and find new ways to present their songs. This would include new styles, such as acoustic versions, and adding new parts to the song. Sometimes, this "growth" (for lack of a better term) can even make the song better live.

Most importantly though, it should be LIVE, not tapes or music played on a machine.

Ashlee isn't the first to get caught. Does anyone remember ELO???

Jefrystube  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 1:54 PM
I don't recall hearing anything about ELO. Please give a link or elaborate and include the year. You caught my eye with this one! How'd I ever miss it?

Lachatte  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 2:04 PM
My band used to cover ELO. I remember doing "Evil Woman". The keyboard player used a Melatron to cover the string parts. Does anyone remember the Melatron?
My parents lent us a thousand dollars to buy one. There were three settings: vocals, strings and flutes. It was essentially a big tape player.

INeedAlover  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 2:12 PM
After ELO released "Out Of The Blue" in 1977 they went on a worldwide tour inside an ELO Spaceship. I saw the show firsthand at the Silverdome in Detroit. Since the acoutics weren't great in my upper deck seats, it was really hard to tell what was or not being played.

During that tour, many rumours and news reports surfaced about ELO using tapes instead of playing music live. Evidence included seeing some of the musicians instruments dropped during key performance parts (like the cellos), songs sounding just like the LP (CD's weren't invented yet), and the band doing sound checks by only playing tapes, not performing live.

I was there, but my poor seats wouldn't let me tell you whether it was live or memorex. But one thing for sure, the group was never the same afterwards. They fired most of the musicians that played the string instruments, and had issues with their record label making phony copies of their LP and selling them (an RIAA record label practice Meat Loaf also complained about) to avoid royalties.

Look them up at www.allmusic.com for further info. Needless to say, since this happened more than 25 years ago, I doubt you'd find much on the internet on it today. If you do, let me know.

indieWarriors  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 2:31 PM
While its terrific that the techonology allows us to produce our own music..it has become a double edged sword crutch basically for people to acquire perfected performance.

I learned from experience being on solo gigs is that if the material is good..you perform at the best peak without any reservation of trying so hard to make it a perfect show...at least for me...it made me self concious...i loved my material and just sang and played even tho I didnt move much and my eyes were closed 90% of the time heh but i gotten great responses because i didnt think to perform a "perfect" show.

my point is..i wish more concerts were about performers who love their material and want to express it on stage because they want to. with so much crass prefab music written by a dozen writers...how does that ever happen?

Jefrystube  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 2:35 PM
Thanks, I'd never heard all that. Never saw them in concert. Went to the Fleetwood Mac Tusk Tour and Heart's Dog& Butterfly instead. I liked ELO, though, favoite album, "Time", it's out there.

JohnCarlton02  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 3:22 PM
What's kinda funny about this whole Ashlee Simpson thing is Eminem was on SNL last week & also used prerecorded vocals. There were a number of times his trap was shut, yet his voice was still audible.

compmore  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 4:31 PM
yes I saw that too. I was waiting for something to be said. I noticed that mic went right up in front of his mouth the moment it happened

INeedAlover  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 4:56 PM
What's even funnier about the whole Ashlee Simpson thing is that I fell asleep and didn't see the second performance. I had to see it later on the net. Before I crashed, just shortly after seeing her FIRST PERFORMANCE, I thought immediately that she was lip synching. It was obvious in her first song, and some news stations repeated parts of THAT performance to show the song that was duplicated. She was way off on the first song. It was painfully obvious.

pinemikey  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 5:17 PM
I don't know if anyone here knows of April Wine...but during the early eighties they used to tour Newfoundland (the drummer was from Newfoundland, I think) and they would hire and extra guitarist to really fill in the sound. Their concerts were about 2 hours or so...not a chance of lip syncing with these guys..but they were the best shows I've ever seen....maybe because I was slightly intoxicated (ok..heavily intoxicated) at the time..but what a show. The power of the all the guitars in perfect harmony was amazing...sort of like getting an audio induced chest massage. You always left their concerts slightly deaf :) but wholly satisfied.

Those hangovers the next day where the only fly in the ointment....

mroop  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 6:18 PM
"Does anyone remember the Melatron?"

Sure - the mellotron, very big in the 70's. Lots of the prog bands used the mellotron.

"I don't know if anyone here knows of April Wine"

I Like To Rock, Sign Of The Gypsy Queen, Roller, Just Between You And Me, etc. They were a mid-level act in the States in the 70's - I don't think they ever did headlining tours.

pinemikey  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 6:27 PM
"They were a mid-level act in the States in the 70's - I don't think they ever did headlining tours."

In Canada they did...try and dig up "Oowatanite" and you'll be suitably impressed. It was a signature song at every concert. They were one of the top rock bands from Canada for a lot of years, not in the same league as Rush, but still one of my favorites.


gdZiemann  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 6:51 PM
April Wine is one of the few acts to have a release ship platinum in Canada -- "The Whole World's Goin' Crazy" (1976)

They were from Montreal.

goldenpi  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 7:18 PM
Everything is data. Manipulate data well, and you can produce a hit from anyone. Manipulate data really well, and you could produce a hit from nothing at all - synth both music and vocals. Make it a trance track - the words are so heavily processed, why not just start from blank?

SuitablyTwisted  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 7:29 PM
Speaking of Canadian bands, anyone remember Moxy?

mroop: any listings for them on CD?

pinemikey  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 9:45 PM
Obscure Canadian bands for $200..

How about Nash the Slash? or Doug and the Slugs?

captdunsel  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 10:06 PM
interesting really.

being old and stupid, I remember a group called Head East.

The album "flat as a pancake" (yeah I actually owned the 8 track) was recorded in the studio. it totally sucked (I liked the songs but....)

Another album (again actually an 8 track) Head East Live actually showcased what the band could do when they left them alone and let them play.

listen to the two and tell me again why a performer needs these enhancements.

CodeWarrior  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 10:39 PM
"You can polish a turd, but it will still smell if you get too close."

And if you put a receiver under a turd's coat, he will declare it's only a poorly tailored shirt.

CodeWarrior  
Date: November 2, 2004 @ 10:40 PM
Atomic Rooster!
'nuff said.

OneUnderAttack  
Date: November 3, 2004 @ 2:30 AM
As a person attacking the industry from both inside and outside, I know that the industry is taking a major hit because of this Ashlee Simpson thing. She was lip-Syncing, because she doesn't really sing the album completely in the first place. There has been many pretty faces who cannot sing who have been given a record deal. What they do, is make people sound better than shit. Singers who can really sing record their voices over the original track to make the robust sound you usually hear. So the truth is that Ashlee isn't a good performer. When there was a mistake, she didn't play with it like a real performer would.

goldenpi  
Date: November 3, 2004 @ 11:41 AM
Of course. A star needs at a minimum three talents: Good voice, good looks and good music-writing. But how often are these found in one person? So the solution is to create composites - have one person provide the looks (consumers love scantily-clothed sexy figures), either enhance their voice or have another sing it, and have a label-supplied professional songwriter produce the music and lyrics. Fake the live performances.

awehr  
Date: November 3, 2004 @ 7:55 PM
I was looking at the headline.

If they have trouble hitting and holding certain notes, then they should not be signed.

Bufo  
Date: November 4, 2004 @ 8:09 AM

Yes, goldenpi, many see this kind of thing as "Fake the live performances"

But I'm still not convinced that there is really anything wrong with all of this. If voice enhancement makes the show better in the eyes (or perhaps I should say the ears) of the audience, and folks are still willing to pay to hear/see Britney do her 'thing' with voice enhancement -- well, hell, why not?

Engineers use computers to "enhance" their calculations. Now, this may mean that engineers don't have to be as good or as quick at math as they use to be (since computers do a lot of the calculations for them). But these computers make engineers more productive, and everyone ultimately benefits as a result.

INeedAlover  
Date: November 4, 2004 @ 9:23 AM
Bufo,

Britney Spears couldn't pay ME to see her in concert. So I am NEVER WILLING to pay to hear/see her. And if I did, I would expect to see HER sing, not hear her CD in the background while she danced. If I want to pay to see dancing, I'll pay to see a dance show. Of course, if that's what you ARE expecting when you pay to see Britney, then more power to you. And if her dancing makes it impossible to sing herself, let someone else do it. It is supposed to be about the EFFEN music, isn't it??????

Your comparison to Engineers doesn't make sense. No one is paying Engineers to see them make these calculations themselves live. If someone was, and then found out they were using computers to be more productive live, I think I would be PISSED as a paying customer, wouldn't you?

Lachatte  
Date: November 5, 2004 @ 8:03 AM
I read this update and thought I'd post it in case anybody gives a s***.
"In related news, Ashlee's drummer has decided to take the bullet over her "SNL" lip-synch debacle.

"I am in charge of starting the songs and cueing their backing tracks (miscellaneous percussion, random sound effects, etc.)," Chris Fox writes on the teen star's website. "Plain and simple, I cued the wrong song."

As for those who would cruelly poke fun at Ashlee's televised train wreck, Fox says, "You people need to grow up."

Yeah.
http://entertainment.msn.com/music/hotgossipB