Username:
Password:






 
More Music Acts Going Independent Route
Posted by Mike (Shmoo) on August 11, 2005 at 6:36 AM   (printer friendly)

More Music Acts Going Independent Route --AP

By JUSTIN GLANVILLE, Associated Press Writer
Wed Aug 10, 3:30 PM ET



NEW YORK - In 2000, the Churchills thought they had it made. The New York-based pop band had landed a major-label record deal and were fixed up with producer Mark Hart, former keyboardist with the seminal Australian band Crowded House.

Hart and the band booked a posh recording studio and the label, Universal, gave them a near-limitless budget. They recorded with only the finest guitars and ate gourmet lunches — all charged to the album expense account.

Three months later, they had spent $270,000 and the record was finished. But strangely, nothing seemed to be happening.

"It felt like we were nobody's priority," said Churchills bassist-vocalist Bart Schoudel. "We would stop by the label's marketing department, and they would say, 'Oh, you guys made a great record and I think the critics are going to love it.'"

Countless other bands have found themselves in a similar quandary: Signed to a major label, with promises of widespread distribution and big promotional budgets, yet going nowhere. They are casualties of an industry increasingly geared toward acts who can reliably sell millions of albums at a time.

As a result, a growing number of artists who do not fit that paradigm are going independent — financing their own records and tours, securing distribution deals and serving as their own publicists.

For these so-called Do It Yourself artists, securing a major-label deal is no longer the object of their aspirations. They have either become disillusioned with the majors based on past mishaps or never saw a place for themselves within the establishment to begin with. Their efforts have been facilitated by home recording and the Internet.

The Chruchills have released two albums since leaving Universal in 2001. And Christopher Dallman, a 26-year-old singer-songwriter based in Los Angeles, got private financing to record his first album, "Race the Light," two years ago. He shopped it around to small labels when it was finished, eventually piquing the interest of New Jersey-based Treasure Records.

He's since signed with a booking agent and will tour Ireland and North America this summer. He supplements his schedule by booking scattershot shows on his own, makes his own fliers and maintains his own Web site, all without the help of a manager or publicist.

"Most important are your songs, your live show, your album," Dallman said. "But it's a major mistake to think that your work ends there. I am on my computer all day long, making contacts, sending e-mails, researching different ways of getting my stuff out there. So time-consuming, but really worth it."

This allows him to maintain control over his own creative output. Major labels often exert pressure on artists to record material that is radio-friendly; a famous recent example is Fiona Apple, whose third album was rejected by her label allegedly for not being commercial enough and has since been leaked on the Internet.

"I can't imagine being creative with restrictions," Dallman said.

Since the 1970s, major labels have increasingly viewed musicians more in terms of their marketability than their talent, said Steven Zuckerman, executive producer of New York City's annual Global Entertainment Media Summit, a conference for independent artists.

Even by late in that decade, he said, "a business created by passionate music fans had become a business run by accountants and attorneys who treated an art form as nothing different than a box of shoes." Consolidation has been the major force behind that trend, he said.

The DIY business model has long been prevalent among punk-rockers, who began to record and distribute their own material in the early 1980s. But only recently have other genres begun to adopt DIY practices, inspired by the success of such artists as Aimee Mann and Ani DiFranco.

DiFranco is the unofficial DIY hero. She founded her own label, Righteous Babe Records, in 1990 and became famous based on her manic touring and recording schedule. Mann, meanwhile, releases records on her own Superego imprint — though her profile got a big boost when her songs were included on the "Magnolia" soundtrack, released in 1999 on a major label.

The number of people recording music has also skyrocketed as home recording equipment and software have become increasingly affordable. A basic recording program, which can handle about 16 separate tracks, can now be bought for less than $100.

Skilled DIY musicians can learn to record music partially or wholly at home that sounds almost as good as what can be produced in a slick studio. The Churchills' new album, for example, cost them less than $10,000.

How are all these aspiring musicians marketing their product? The Internet has been a huge boon, because it allows cheap, direct distribution of music to — and communication with — fans. Practically every artist now has an official Web site, most offering free MP3 downloads, and they maintain e-mail lists to promote upcoming shows and releases. Many musicians also sign up with services that license their songs to pay-per-download sites like iTunes.

A growing number of DIY bands have also begun to license their songs to television. The popularity of youth-oriented shows such as "Scrubs," "Everwood" and "The O.C." has created a burgeoning demand for music to be used in the background of scenes or over closing credits.

Ron Haney, lead guitarist and vocalist for the Churchill, spends several weeks a year in Los Angeles pitching the band's songs to television insiders. "TV is the new radio," Haney said. "Kids don't listen to radio like they used to. TV is what's used now to break bands."

Since 1999, the Churchills have had songs placed in several shows, including all the ones mentioned above. Dallman has had a song placed in MTV's "The Real World."

In sum, artists say, the key is self reliance. Among the nine members of The Sharp Things, a New York-based orchestral pop band featuring horns and strings, are a music publicist, a Web designer, a journalist, a marketing professional, two video directors and a music business attorney.

Says lead vocalist Perry Serpa: "We're a very self-sufficient bunch."

The band self-released its first album, "Here Comes the Sharp Things," in 2002; it won favorable reviews and got the band noticed by New Jersey-based indie label Bar/None, which released the follow-up, "Foxes and Hounds," in May.

Still, the band — like all DIY bands — does not rely on its label to sell it to the public, as have bands of the past. Nor does it hire "outsiders" to do its legwork.

"What's the point of seeking out certain people who would have half the passion, take twice as long to get the job done and are not as invested?" said Serpa. "We tend to outsource only when it's completely necessary."

But if the bottom line becomes irrelevant — or at least de-emphasized — what defines success among artists who choose to do it all themselves?

"The beauty of it is that the ideal of 'success' can be defined by each individual artist," Serpa said. "If you manufacture 1,500 records with the intention of selling them all on the road over two years' time and you achieve that, then that is success. The deal is that you really no longer need the bottom-liners to define that for you anymore."


User Comments (These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)

INeedAlover  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 10:05 AM
"Even by late in that decade, he said, "a business created by passionate music fans had become a business run by accountants and attorneys who treated an art form as nothing different than a box of shoes." Consolidation has been the major force behind that trend, he said."

WOW. I've never heard it worded better. The ULTIMATE reason music sales have decreased. NOT P2P. NOT Piracy. But this. Read it again and again.

Consolidation of the music business is what has destroyed it.... NOT P2P. Gee, isn't that what we've been saying all along?

gdZiemann  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 11:49 AM
Exactly. Peer-to-peer has been the scapegoat for the major labels' greed and lack of love for music.

RaidHHI  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 4:44 PM
INeedAlover,

"Consolidation of the music business is what has destroyed it.... NOT P2P. Gee, isn't that what we've been saying all along?"

No, your right; downloading full length albums before they are even available in stores has absolutely nothing to do with the losses. nothing at all.

/sarcasm mode off.

independentm...  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 6:05 PM
RaidHHI, I am glad you are certainly not "with them" (but you still don't see eye to eye with us either!)

Jazzmary2U  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 8:21 PM
YaYYYY!! :hyper: my time has finally come.. I have been indy for a long time.. and now I can do something about it!!

Jazzmary2U  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 8:23 PM
Raid.. is this guy the new mroop??!!?? Next time you post, give is FACTS! :type: give us LINKS! :clue: Give us something beside a poor version of sarcasm!!

Jazzmary2U  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 8:24 PM
...sorry, mroop! :scared:

independentm...  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 11:30 PM
RaidHHI is his own person I am sure. (Mroop would probably HATE him worse than he hates the rest of us because RaidHHI is up-front about a desire to "raid" the RIAA tunes and share them willy nilly, hither and yon, in an attempt to hurt the industry. I, myself, and many of the rest of us here strongly disagree with RaidHHI in regards to that sort of tactic...)

independentm...  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 11:33 PM
...but RaidHHI has never crossed the line with us and is a VALUED visitor/participant even if oppinions differ.

independentm...  
Date: August 11, 2005 @ 11:34 PM
(Him and GeorgeZ have GREAT fights!)

VERY informative stuff comes out of their "tiffs"

RaidHHI  
Date: August 12, 2005 @ 11:25 AM
Jazzmary2U,

"Raid.. is this guy the new mroop??!!?? Next time you post, give is FACTS! :type: give us LINKS! :clue: Give us something beside a poor version of sarcasm!!"

Your kidding I hope? Mroop and myself are not the same person. I'm pretty sure we don't even agree on much. Well, aside from the ignorance levels here, we aren't on the same side, no.

independentm,

"RaidHHI is his own person I am sure. (Mroop would probably HATE him worse than he hates the rest of us because RaidHHI is up-front about a desire to "raid" the RIAA tunes and share them willy nilly, hither and yon, in an attempt to hurt the industry. I, myself, and many of the rest of us here strongly disagree with RaidHHI in regards to that sort of tactic...)"

I don't know of mroop actually hates me or not; I've never exchanged heated discussion with him. We seem to be formal... One thing that does tend to make me different from you tho with regards to mroop, I know what I'm doing is against the law; I've made no effort to sidestep it, and I'm doing it with high quality files; Unlike many p2pers who seem to think leeching tunes in vast quantities (and don't tell me people don't, I work on computers for a living, and I see what goes on.) is perfectly okay. So from a technicality standpoint, I'm okay. I know what I'm doing is illegal, and I don't try to defend it.

But as I said, mroop and I have never discussed our opposing views. I haven't found myself in his crosshairs yet, either.

"(Him and GeorgeZ have GREAT fights!)"

George has record industry experience, granted he flunked out; But hes atleast tasted it. I have no insider experience with record industry. George holds a personal grudge due to his own failures. As I have no failures with the riaa, I can't hate them for the same reasons. George has alterier reasons for hating the riaa, He feels they screwed him. He's going to have to live with the fact that he's going to be as this guy on my server, always "unknown in san antone".

I'm for the most part, a consumer of music; I can't play a tune to save my life. :)




mroop  
Date: August 13, 2005 @ 4:35 PM
"RaidHHI is his own person I am sure. (Mroop would probably HATE him worse than he hates the rest of us because RaidHHI is up-front about a desire to "raid" the RIAA tunes and share them willy nilly, hither and yon, in an attempt to hurt the industry."

WTF are you talking about? I don't hate Raid and I don't care if people break into warehouses and steal RIAA physical product, much less download it. When did I ever say I don't like people downloading music? Are you losing your mind?

What I do find irritating is the constant reiteration of patently false or ignorant information. For example, your repeated statements that the RIAA has deemed independent music "illegitimate" - WHICH THEY HAVE NEVER SAID. As the moderator of this site, you should be truthful and not proliferate false information like the ignorant propagandists that are so plentiful here.

mroop  
Date: August 13, 2005 @ 4:38 PM
"One thing that does tend to make me different from you tho with regards to mroop, I know what I'm doing is against the law; I've made no effort to sidestep it, and I'm doing it with high quality files"

And this is why I like Raid, he is upfront about what he is doing. He's not a dumbass like INeedALover, constantly spewing ignorant legalisms like: downloading copyrighted files is legal because of AHRA. Stupidity like that is what pisses me off.

mroop  
Date: August 13, 2005 @ 4:40 PM
And finally, I don't hate anyone on this site. There a a couple people that annoy the hell out of me because of their constant ignorant and false interpretations of the law. Chief among them would be INeedALover and Awehr because they both think they know the law but they don't know squat. Awehr is the worst - he really thinks he knows what he is talking about and he always used big words incorrectly. There is nothing worse than a guy trying to sound smart and making a fool out of himself.

ShadowMom  
Date: August 13, 2005 @ 7:44 PM
mroop, I knew you had been quiet for way too long. :)

Jazzmary2U  
Date: August 14, 2005 @ 9:07 AM
"I don't know of mroop actually hates me or not; I've never exchanged heated discussion with him." Wow.. I didn't know that heated discussions about differing opinions equals hate.. If you are respectful about it, it is healthy discourse.

"George holds a personal grudge due to his own failures."
"Are you losing your mind?"
"Stupidity like that is what pisses me off."
"...not proliferate false information like the ignorant propagandists that are so plentiful here.."

Refer to my first statement. As mroop is bullish on grammar, spelling, fact-checking, etc. I am bullish on intelligent, RESECTFUL discourse.. that means CHILL the name-calling!! All this does is pull folks way off-topic of the original post, which, in this case, was about what??
Not to mention the dilution of the point your are trying to make. :nod: