Username:
Password:






 
Music industry slump accelerated in 2005
Posted by Mike (Shmoo) on December 18, 2005 at 2:05 AM   (printer friendly)

Music industry slump accelerated in 2005

Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:27 PM ET165
By Brian Garrity - Reuters


NEW YORK (Billboard) - It all seemed so promising for the music business heading into 2005. CD sales were up, albeit ever so slightly, for the first time in four years. Legitimate purchases of downloads and ringtones for the first time totaled in hundreds of millions of dollars. And file traders and peer-to-peer network operators were on the run from industry lawsuits. The seeds of recorded-music's recovery from Napster, it appeared, had been sown at long last.

But a funny thing happened in year two of the industry's anticipated comeback story: The turnaround never materialized.

During the last 12 months, CD sales took two steps back, rather than one step forward, retreating about 8% to 2003 unit volume levels, according to Nielsen SoundScan. Even with blossoming digital download sales factored in, total music sales are still running behind 2004 by 4%.

Industry executives are grappling with the vexing question of just what went wrong in the last year. Some blame the sales letdown on the dearth of superstar product in 2005. Other industry watchers point to growing cannibalization by iPods and CD burning. Still others say the digital music market is developing too slowly, even with its gains.

This much is clear: All the label restructurings, anti-piracy efforts, aggressive pricing strategies and increased digital distribution sales were not enough to save the music business from itself in 2005.

If anything, recorded-music companies were confronted with the reality that no magic-bullet solutions exist to their problems, as many of their heavily hyped initiatives fell short of expectations in the near term.

The popularity of iPod and iTunes did not create a new dominant music format. Label executives are expressing concern that despite a 150% increase in digital track sales in 2005, driven by Apple Computer, iTunes is not developing quickly enough to offset the flagging CD business. Internet piracy did not decline significantly in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling against Grokster in July.

CD content protection not only failed to stop unauthorized copying of music, it emerged as a liability for labels distributing the technology. DualDiscs have not caught the imagination of consumers or the industry at large as the savior of physical product, despite favorable reviews. Concerns over demand, production costs and compatibility have many labels cool to the concept.

The merger of Sony and BMG did not shift the balance of power among the major labels. And the initial public offering of Warner Music Group was not a home run payday for investors.

WARNING SIGNS

As 2006 approaches, improving operations, reviving physical sales, fanning digital music commerce and stamping out casual piracy remain monumental challenges for an industry in wrenching transition.

The warning signs that something was amiss in 2005 were apparent from the get-go.

The album business was already skidding badly by the close of 2004. A 7% gain in overall industry sales as of mid-September that year had dwindled to a razor-thin 1.6% margin by the end of 2004.

The downward spiral only continued as 2005 opened. First-quarter album sales stumbled out of the gate, dipping 9% year over year in part because a blockbuster Valentine's Day/Grammy Award selling period -- a key lynchpin of 2004's success -- never materialized.

As 2005's sales sputtered, distraction was the dominant theme for three of the four major labels. Warner Music was busy prepping for its initial public offering, EMI was feeling the pressure of delivering hit product on a time schedule that matched the agenda of its investors, and Sony BMG was bogged down integrating its operations -- an effort that was hamstrung as executives from the old Sony and BMG entities were locked in internal power struggles for turf in the new company.

Further adding to the industry's distractions was New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's looming investigation into pay-for-play practices. Sony BMG and Warner Music would settle with Spitzer's office by year's end, agreeing to change their promotion practices and make charitable donations, but they did not admit any wrongdoing.

Avoiding these headlines was market leader Universal Music Group, which reached new heights of market-share dominance with a string of hits from 50 Cent, Kanye West, the Game, the Black Eyed Peas, the Pussycat Dolls, Gwen Stefani and others.

Warner Music's IPO and the challenges of operating a music label as a public company dominated headlines in the first half of the year. The label group raised $554.2 million in the May 11 deal -- 20% less than its initial target.

The deal sparked soul searching throughout the industry, as many executives winced at the high-profile collision of art and commerce. To ready itself for the IPO, the company cut deep into its cost structure, stripping out more than $250 million in overhead, a move that caused much hand-wringing in the industry and among leading Warner acts like Linkin Park, which wanted to get out of its contract but appeared to have made peace with the label by year's end.

But perhaps the biggest impact of the deal is that it clouded the potential for a much-anticipated merger with EMI. The IPO's inability to create a strong currency has raised questions over who would be the buyer and who would be the seller in a proposed transaction.

Infighting at Sony BMG ruled the headlines in the second half of 2005. As the year came to a close, BMG and Sony executives were engaged in open warfare over the future of Sony BMG CEO Andrew Lack. Lack's contract is up in March, and Bertelsmann executives want to replace him in favor of chairman Rolf Schmidt-Holtz when the deal is up, if not sooner. Sources close to Lack maintain that he is not going anywhere.

So far the merger has failed to live up to expectations. The combination initially was expected to challenge UMG's position as the industry kingpin. Sony BMG's combined pre-merger market share of 30.2% overshadowed UMG's 27.1%. But after a year of aggressive cost-cutting and integration efforts, the company is still running second to UMG in terms of market share, partially because of a cooling off of the once red hot Zomba Group, home of Britney Spears and R. Kelly.

The last straw for Bertelsmann executives came in July when Sony BMG COO Michael Smellie -- the highest-ranking former BMG executive involved in the day-to-day operations of the joint venture -- announced plans to exit the company at year's end, and Lack indicated he wanted to eliminate the position. Bertelsmann execs were also unhappy with Lack's renewal of Bruce Springsteen's contract, which sources value at $100 million. The situation remains in flux.

Reuters/Billboard

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.


User Comments (These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)

independentm...  
Date: December 18, 2005 @ 2:09 AM
DeadMan2003
Date: December 17, 2005 @ 5:49 PM
http://www.leadingthecharge.com/stories/news- 00113100.html

Digital downloads lost heat as year progressed
Staff and agencies
16 December, 2005



By Antony Bruno 44 minutes ago

LOS ANGELES (Billboard) - Digital music news dominated the music industry landscape in 2005. But the jury remains out: Will the year�s developments bode well or poorly for a business struggling to redefine itself?

Digital downloads got off to a strong start in 2005. More than 155 million tracks were downloaded in the first half of the year, quickly surpassing the 141 million tracks downloaded during all of 2004.

According to research firm NPD Group, Apple Computer�s iTunes Music Store now sells more music than retailers Tower Records or Borders Books & Music. Digital revenue overall, including ringtones sales and subscription services, now accounts for 5% of label revenue on average, double that of last year.

But as the year wore on, the growth of downloads began to slow. In May, about 6.4 million downloads were selling per week; average weekly downloads for the third quarter were only up to 6.6 million, according to Nielsen SoundScan.

The Supreme Court�s July ruling that peer-to-peer file sharing sites could be held liable for copyright infringement did little to stem P2P traffic: According to BigChampagne, 26.8% more files were being traded this year. But it did spur a flurry of activity.

The Recording Industry Assn. of America, the lobbying arm of the major U.S. labels, in September began issuing cease-and-desist letters to seven major violators, including BearShare, LimeWire and WinMX.

That same month, eDonkey chief Sam Yagan pledged to rid the network of unauthorized files. BearShare and i2hub subsequently went dark, and on November 7, Grokster Grokster settled with the music industry for $50 million and announced it would convert to an authorized service.

Overseas, Kazaa owner Sharman Networks was held liable in Australia for copyright infringement in September and agreed to shutter its service in the country. Kazaa remains available elsewhere in the world, at least until a February appeal.

"The Grokster decision . . . provides some clarity to move forward and do some business," says Ted Cohen, senior VP of digital development and distribution for EMI Group.

On October 25, former pirate P2P service iMesh launched a beta version of its authorized file-sharing service. The industry continues to wait for Mashboxx to make its Snocap-powered service publicly available, and still more services are in various stages of development.

In November, Sony BMG ignited a storm of controversy when computer programer Mark Russinovich discovered the major label�s CD copy-protection technology secretly embedded hidden files in users� computers, making them vulnerable to attack.

Class actions in California, New York and Texas were filed within weeks of the discovery, and Sony BMG later recalled and offered to replace the affected CDs. The company also issued a patch to fix the damage on users� computers.

The controversy may mark a turning point for the role of digital rights management (DRM) in the industry at large.

"We need to see a change in perspective on the part of the rights holders," Gartner G2 analyst Mike McGuire says, "to DRM as a tool for accounting and tracking content as opposed to just locking it."

"This was the year of mobile," EMI�s Cohen says. "Mobile became front-of-mind for both consumers and the content companies."

U.S. ringtone sales were on pace to surpass $500 million in 2005, double last year�s total. Coldplay and Madonna first released singles from new albums as ringtones, setting a trend expected to become an early-release standard.

Motorola and Apple finally unveiled their much-anticipated iTunes-compatible phone, to lackluster response -- it was returned a reported six times more than normal -- while Nokia Nokia and Sony Ericsson made waves overseas with the N91 and Walkman 600i, respectively. Seeding the market with these "music phones" is considered a necessary step toward making wireless music distribution a reality.

The biggest advancement came in November, when Sprint offered the first over-the-air, full-song download service in the United States. The wireless operator is charging $2.50 for each song downloaded to the phone, and a digital file is sent to buyers� computers as well.

Many took issue with the price, particularly because a ringtone is not included. Most analysts see $1.50 as the sweet spot for mobile song downloads.

But the prevailing view is that pricing can be changed, and many expect Sprint to offer new features and alternative pricing plans once competitors Cingular and Verizon Wireless introduce similar services early next year.

Meanwhile, subscription services emerged as an alternative to a la carte downloads for those looking to take their music with them. Napster Napster launched its portable subscription service February 3 with a $30 million advertising campaign highlighted by a Super Bowl ad.

Yahoo later raised eyebrows with the introduction of a $4.99-per-month offer for both portable and standard music subscriptions, undercutting its competition by almost $10 and sparking a pricing debate. Eventually, the company raised its portable rates to $9.99.

Overall, subscription services continue to struggle to gain a mass audience compared with a la carte services. IDC estimates there are 11.5 million pay-per-download users compared with 3.4 million subscription service users.

Portable devices supporting subscription, or tethered, downloads still suffer from usability problems. Privately, some label executives feel subscription services may never take off until Apple launches one of its own.

And as the iPod continues to dominate the market for portable media players, the rest of the consumer electronics industry is turning its focus to the living room as the next digital media battleground.

"The overall industry needs to foster and enable the transition to grow the mass consumer market," Gartner G2�s McGuire says. "We�re going to need all industry partners to highlight the proposition that getting music online is actually a better way to get music."

Reuters/Billboard
DeadMan2003
Date: December 17, 2005 @ 5:50 PM
http://www.emailbattles.com/archive/battles/p 2p_aacdgfggfg_a/
Music 2006: P2P Ascends as Moguls Fall

Posted on 12/16/2005 @ 15:16:07 in P2P.

In the Beginning, it cost a bundle to stamp and promote a record. One of 10,000 artists who chased a recording contract got lucky. Of those, a few became Big Names. Even got houses, cars, pool boys and chamber maids as hot as those enjoyed by recording execs.

As for creations by the undiscovered... like trees falling deep in a forest, they didn't make a sound, vanishing without a trace. The old system was swept aside by the Internet, p2p file sharing networks, home recording studios, and iPods.

Musicians can share their art and develop their skills, build reputations, and sell their CDs on sites like SongRamp and CD Baby, which leads to more butts filling seats at concerts, which leads to more CD sales.

Listeners search for fresh faces by genre or consult sales and review charts, then try the music before plunking down their hard-earned cash.

It's all perfectly transparent with no monthly charges or additional fees for burning songs to CD (a la Napster). All with self-perceived talent are welcome to submit music. If a lot of folks like your work, you'll earn a huge living. Earnings scale down from there, all the way down to... well... the Internet can be a brutally critical space.

So where do the record moguls fit in this low-budget, everybody-gets-a- shot picture? They don't... but they could.

Those who still have a bit of street-cred could take a page from c/net's Download.com shareware site. Encourage all artists to upload, then promise downloaders "Safe, Trusted and Spyware-Free" music, combined with music reviews, listener voting, etc., just like the smaller competitors. The Brand Name will do the rest.

Will lower retail prices stop free file sharing? Nope. The lunatic fringe of the P2P universe won't lay out a dime, no matter what. But reasonable pricing will put a whole lot more folks in the purchasing camp, while easing some of the legal threats facing network managers trying to stomp out illicit file sharing.

There you have it. Use the brand name to attract artists and visitors, provide a system that people consider worth the price, and make sure the talent gets its due.

Can Big Music make a living like this? Tiny distributor CD Baby claims it's paid about US$21 million to artists since 1998. Those who follow this path may have to shed a few pool boys, but at least they'll be around to explain the new model to their shareholders... maybe.

gfmlcka  
Date: December 18, 2005 @ 7:10 AM
"The lunatic fringe of the P2P universe ........"

Yeah, right. WE'RE the lunatics.

"As for creations by the undiscovered... like trees falling deep in a forest, they didn't make a sound, vanishing without a trace."

Much like your so-called journalism. Jerk.

NiceGuy2003  
Date: December 18, 2005 @ 12:49 PM
Apple will never offer a subscription based service.

CynicalGeezer  
Date: December 18, 2005 @ 2:04 PM

I liked the part about how the music cartel couldn't rescue its business in 2005 from its own adverse strategies. So true.


gdZiemann  
Date: December 19, 2005 @ 2:53 PM
"The deal sparked soul searching throughout the industry," but no one had one.

"Industry executives are grappling with the vexing question of just what went wrong in the last year."

Yeah, things were going so well right up until then.

--------
"Label executives are expressing concern that despite a 150% increase in digital track sales in 2005, driven by Apple Computer, iTunes is not developing quickly enough to offset the flagging CD business."

Since each song is a buck, the math is easy. In 2004, Nielsen reported that digital track sales were 141 million. Apple reports selling 180 million songs in the same period.

A 150% increase would mean that the labels have sold about 370 million tracks this year, if the main article is to believed. Apple sold 300 million songs in the first six months of 2005.

CynicalGeezer  
Date: December 19, 2005 @ 6:18 PM

George — good stuff.

INeedAlover  
Date: December 20, 2005 @ 12:59 PM
"Label executives are expressing concern that despite a 150% increase in digital track sales in 2005, driven by Apple Computer, iTunes is not developing quickly enough to offset the flagging CD business."

Considering they destroyed their best source of distributing digital music years back (close of Napster), is it any wonder that the business hasn't progressed?? Not to mention the DRM restrictions included with iTunes tracks, continuing to sue 12-year-old girls, dead grandmas, and disabled moms, and THEN putting out CD's that open your computer to attacks by hackers, I think they should be concerned. A look in the mirror would help.