|
Music industry threatens ISPs over piracy
Music industry threatens ISPs over piracy
The music industry opened up a new front in the war on online music piracy yesterday, threatening to sue internet service providers that allow customers to illegally share copyrighted tracks over their networks.
The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, or IFPI, said it would take action against internet companies that carry vast amounts of illegally shared files over their networks. It stressed that it would prefer not to pursue such a strategy and is keen to work in partnership with internet providers.
John Kennedy, the chairman of the IFPI, said he had been frustrated by internet companies that have not acted against customers involved in illegal activity. He warned that litigation against ISPs would be instigated "in weeks rather than months". Barney Wragg, the head of EMI's digital music division, said the industry had been left "with no other option" but to pursue ISPs in the courts.
The IFPI wants ISPs to disconnect users who refuse to stop exchanging music files illegally. Mr Kennedy said such activity is in breach of a customer's contract with the ISP and disconnecting offenders the IFPI had identified would significantly reduce illegal file sharing.
Mr Kennedy said talks with internet companies have been ongoing over the past year, but no action has been taken. "I realised I was being filibustered ... if they still want to filibuster, their time will run out," he said.
The IFPI took legal action against 10,000 individuals in 18 countries during 2006. It won a spate of significant legal victories against peer-to-peer platforms such as Kazaa that was forced to pay a $115m (£58m) settlement.
A spokesman for the Internet Service Providers Association said ISPs are "mere conduits of information" that can not be held liable for offences committed by customers. "ISPs cannot inspect every packet of data transmitted over their networks," he said.
Geoff Taylor, the executive vice-president and general counsel of IFPI, said that ISPs are in the best position to stop copyright infringements. "While it might be possible to argue that an ISP is exempt from liability for damages, that does not mean rights holders can't obtain an injunction to stop infringements of their copyright," he said.
A spokeswoman for Tiscali, a UK ISP, said the onus is on the IFPI to prove that the user is engaged in illegal activity and that the music organisation should share the cost of resolving disputes. Last year, due to a lack of evidence, Tiscali refused to close the accounts or hand over the details of 17 customers who the British Phonographic Industry claimed were involved in illegal file sharing.
During 2006, global digital music sales doubled to about $2bn on the back of an 89 per cent surge in music downloads to 795 million. The success of the digital music market has been underlined by bands like Koopa which is expected to score a Top-40 hit this week despite having no record label or any physical copies of their CD on sale.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
Jazzmary2U
|
Date: January 20, 2007 @ 9:44 AM
:pirate: AArggh ye mateys! |
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 20, 2007 @ 1:40 PM
In other news, the Dept. of Justice has announced that all US automakers, highway departments and state motor vehicle departments will be sued out of existence for providing getaway vehicles, licensing and escape routes for bank robbers. |
|
InsaneWayne
|
Date: January 20, 2007 @ 8:23 PM
Clyde, of Bonnie and Clyde fame, once wrote Henry Ford thanking him for a superior getaway vehicle.
Why wasnt Ford jailed and his company desmantled? |
|
JLBRMECHANIC
|
Date: January 20, 2007 @ 11:47 PM
In 2003 the RIAA sued Verizon, SBC Communications and Charter Communications trying to force them to turn over the names of alleged copyright infringers and all three ISPs fought and won against the RIAA. There's more to this than meets the the eye guys. Verizon clearly stated that this is "not about piracy, rather it's about privacy". The RIAA cannot threaten an ISP to turn over names of any person without a court order and due process. They are NOT the internet police rather they are simply the conduit in providing the highway of communications to all users everywhere.
You want to hurt the RIAA? Very simple: DO NOT buy ANY RIAA-affiliated music and boycott them all. There's plenty of indie music out there that is NOT RIAA-branded and most if not all indie labels are not against people downloading their music as downloading does not hurt music sales and never did. |
|
Spwee
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 4:28 AM
Yes, its about privacy. My ISP shouldn't be monitoring my activity. Not that filesharing is morally wrong. |
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 2:43 PM
It's not even about privacy. It's about common sense.
"John Kennedy... said he had been frustrated by internet companies that have not acted against customers involved in illegal activity."
This makes it sound as if the customers had already been proven to be guilty of something.
What the ISPs are doing is refusing to act against customers that have been accused of illegal activities unless there is a compelling legal reason to do so, a reason beyond the insistence of a bunch of mercenary lawyers who were on Kazaa and saw someone else who was on Kazaa. |
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 2:50 PM
"Why wasnt Ford jailed and his company desmantled?"
Because he was enjoying hero status at the time.
Before Bonnie and Clyde, the other auto makers tried suing Ford's customers for buying unauthorized vehicles. |
|
InsaneWayne
|
Date: January 22, 2007 @ 11:23 AM
Nice link George :)
and then what happened to the world? Why even the welfare office expects me to have a car, Amish and others are looked at as weird for rejecting cars, horses are "pets" not transportation (unless ya own a Mustang)... it's a very differant world now that anyone can own a car.
What's gonna happen to making money with music? No labels, no producers, ... no more stadium concerts I bet, bars will be packed every weekend, UPS will be busy trying to compete with the US Post Office to deliver phyisical CDs (when fans prefer not to DL DRMless mp3s)...
of course the Horse's Union's lawsuit against automobiles is still pending...
When should an ISP be concerned about what I do with a piece of wire that comes into my house? When a Judge signs a court ordered search warrent. Then an officer of the law can monitor what Im doing from the ISP's local server. Otherwise all an ISP has to do is connect me to the 'net.
If I break the law I AM the one breaking the law, no one should blame myspace, a P2P network, sugardaddy.com, dmusic.com, nor the company that simply connects me to the net. |
|
|