|
Universal exec - say goodbye to the old record co.
Source: The Register
Larry Kenswil, president of Universal Music Group's eLabs, might not speak for all of Universal Music, but he does speak for an important part of it. Kenswil today said labels could no longer "count units" but had to license rights.
The eLabs chief's comments caused a few jaws to drop here in Cannes, but it's part of a sea change in strategy at UMG. The DRM gurus have departed - Barney Wragg left Universal last summer - and Universal is striking deals with anyryone who can hold a pen and scrawl an X. Towards the end of 2006, MySpace, YouTube and Microsoft all agreed to pay Universal for rights to their catalog - material crucial to the success of their products or services.
"We can't think of it as counting unit sales anymore," said Kenswil. "We have to license ... and think like the publishers."
After initially threatening to sue, Universal granted YouTube a license to its catalog, which permits users to repurpose it to create new content. Asked by a panel moderator at MidemNet how much users were paying for the privilege, Kenswil joked,
"Users are creating free content for YouTube. Maybe the question should be, 'How much is YouTube paying its users'", said Kenswil.
That's a subtle dig at the Web 2.0 idea whereby users produce stuff for nothing for the benefit of hugely profitable multinationals (MySpace is owned by News International, and YouTube by Google) , under the guise of "sharing" or "user generated content". This approach to business has been dignified with some fairly bogus pseudo-economics, but is better described by the label "digital sharecropping".
YouTube was granted a blanket master license, but Kenswil said that if artists objected they would request the licensee withdrew the material.
"It's a whole new revenue stream for our record company," he said. Kenswil wouldn't elaborate on how it worked, but said getting the new deals in place was an involved process, and hinted that he'd much prefer not to have to do it company by company.
"The box is getting smaller, so if you don't think outside of the box your company is going to get smaller." Kenswil said.
Asked about the "Long Tail", Kenswil called it "an interesting catchphrase" that wasn't in itself much help to doing business.
He agreed that "larger virtual shelfspace" meant more products would sell more.
"Universal's catalog is 300,000, alot smaller than [last.fm's database] 65m. But most of those 65m will be listened to once. That doesn't make up for the decline in the head."
Kenswil urged record labels to partner with independents:
"Indies have always been the lifeblood of the industry," said Kenswil. "It will fall on indies even more than before to find talent".
The executive's comments made a discussion that took place just moments earlier seem like it belonged to a different era.
Kicking off proceedings at MidemNet, the Recording Industry Ass. of America's maximum leader Mitch Bainwol, and the Motion Picture Ass. of America's executive VP Fritz Attaway took lumps out of Gary Shapiro of the Consumer Electronics Association.
Shapiro said "it's become a profit center for the RIAA to devastate families." Bainwol said DRM " served a legitimate pro-consumer role", in creating new models. Attaway said DRM wasn't perfect, but it "was the only tool we had to prevent indiscriminate copying," and Bainwol accused Shapiro of wanting the destroy the "only way" of doing business the record industry had. Did he just say "the only way"?
Sadly, Shapiro couldn't counter this absurd accusation.
Happily, within an hour, one of Bainwol's own board members had. ®
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 4:15 PM
Larry Kenswil has to answer to Doug Morris at Universal. Morris wants to sue ISPs, wants a cut from the sale of every iPod, is getting a cut from every Zune played and still disallowing Universal's tunes from working with Zune's sharing feature, even though it supposedly uses DRM and shared files are only good for a few days.
Shapiro said "it's become a profit center for the RIAA to devastate families."
"Bainwol accused Shapiro of wanting the destroy the 'only way' of doing business the record industry had."
Devastating families? |
|
Twarrior
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 4:41 PM
Well, the RIAA has devistated families with their lawsuit BS and other forms of legal harassment, including but not limited to 12 year old girls.
I personally think that the perfect solve to this (which has been proposed by indies and consumers and firmly REJECTED by the RIAA) is to charge the ISP's a "flat rate" which allows its users to share music with eachother, remix music, parody, whatever.. and the ISP can pass that charge onto its users.
Maybe a per-user monthly charge based on how many users an ISP has. If an ISP has "thousands" or "hundreds of thousands" of users -- it would be a $5/mo increase for the user.
If an ISP has MILLIONS of users, then it would be a $1/mo increase per user in their monthly bill.
Now lets break it down world wide with some easy hypothetical math:
Lets say, to make the math easy -- out of 6.5 Billion people on this planet -- there are 4 Billion on the Internet. And all of those ISPs have signed up for the "$1/mo per user" deal. That would be $4 Billion per month that the RIAA would make. Do they even make that PER YEAR right now as it stands? Didn't I see something about them making roughly $2 Billion per year? Something like that? |
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 6:38 PM
If they do that, they'll have to start paying the artists. As long as they stick to lawsuits, it's all gravy. |
|
independentm...
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 7:01 PM
Exactly.
BTW, there's another article from the same author immediately below this one worth checking out. (Didn't get it posted til just now. Leflaw already had something about it earlier I think.) |
|
lowdbrent
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 10:07 PM
Did you guys see the latest Steve Jobs Key Note Address? Apple iPods still have the marketshare. ITunes still has 62% of the market and is the 4th largest seller of all music behind WalMart, BestBuy and Target, and ahead of Amazon.
Since CDBaby get's you in to all of these as part of the deal, more power to the indie. Make great music, get hooked up with CDBaby, get on all of the digital download services, and know that 100 million iPod users (not even counting the others) have access to it.
Now we have to get indies organized and it in front of the people with the same power that the big three have. |
|
independentm...
|
Date: January 21, 2007 @ 10:43 PM
Hey lowdbrent, when you come across items like that, mouse-over the "News" button above, then scroll down to "submit" clickable.
(Twarrior, we NEED a HUGE "submit article/item" button on the front page ...nay! STRIKE THAT!... we need it on EVERY page of Boycott Riaa.) |
|
CopyrightLaw...
|
Date: January 22, 2007 @ 12:20 PM
"I personally think that the perfect solve to this (which has been proposed by indies and consumers and firmly REJECTED by the RIAA) is to charge the ISP's a "flat rate" which allows its users to share music with eachother, remix music, parody, whatever.. and the ISP can pass that charge onto its users.
Why the ISP? What if you use the internet and don't share music files? The ISP shouldn't be the collector of bucks for the RIAA. Those programs that share the music should pay a flat fee per month. All other sharing of content on the internet, such as youtube, should be paid by the sites hosting the copyrighted material, like youtube. No need to involve any ISP. |
|
TotallyFrust...
|
Date: January 22, 2007 @ 1:05 PM
"Why the ISP? What if you use the internet and don't share music files?.."
Agreed. Personally, I boycott these guys. The last thing I want is to give them a way to reach directly into my pocket and extract money for products that I do not want.
The best variant I've seen is a voluntary (I believe we had an article on this from England) payment plan that allows users to opt in. with that scenario, anyone who wants to "RENT" music from the RIAA can continue to do so without the rest of us being forced to buy into that folly. |
|
MajorTreat
|
Date: January 23, 2007 @ 12:05 PM
He mean say goddbye to the RIAA in general and "Vivendique Universale" the (world of dirtiness and moral decay) and their execs!
Bye Bye Bye RIAA! Have a rotten time in Hell! |
|
CopyrightLaw...
|
Date: January 23, 2007 @ 5:33 PM
Hmmmmmmm reminds me of a lyric from an old Who song.
"Meet the new boss... same as the old boss..." |
|
JDonahue
|
Date: January 26, 2007 @ 11:09 PM
I think the labels now have no choice but to let the users share.
The fact is, that new technology is allowing users to create videos at little or no cost. So, instead of illegal downloading, users are now reverting to making user created content for others to download for free, making a platform to compete against the record labels who continue to do out-of-date business models.
So the RIAA may have to completely adjust so that the music can be freely flowed so that record labels and artists can make lots of money, while at the same time, consumers get more music. |
|
|