|
Pillaged MySpace Photos in Massive BitTorrent File
Origin:
http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/01/myspace_torrent
A 17-gigabyte file purporting to contain more than half a million images lifted from private MySpace profiles has shown up on BitTorrent, potentially making it the biggest privacy breach yet on the top social networking site.
The creator of the file says he compiled the photos earlier this month using the MySpace security hole that Wired News reported on last week. That hole, still unacknowledged by the News Corporation-owned site, allowed voyeurs to peek inside the photo galleries of some MySpace users who had set their profiles to "private," despite MySpace's assurances that such images could only be seen by people on a user's friends' list.
"I think the greatest motivator was simply to prove that it could be done," file creator "DMaul" says in an e-mail interview. "I made it public that I was saving these images. However, I am certain there are mischievous individuals using these hacks for nefarious purposes."
The MySpace hole surfaced last fall, and it was quickly seized upon by the self-described pedophiles and ordinary voyeurs who used it, among other things, to target 14- and 15-year-old users who'd caught their eye online. A YouTube video showed how to use the bug to retrieve private profile photos. The bug also spawned a number of ad-supported sites that made it easy to retrieve photos. One such site reported more than 77,000 queries before MySpace closed the hole last Friday following Wired News' report.
By then, DMaul, a denizen of the online forum TribalWar.com who declined to reveal his name, used an automated script to run nearly 44,000 MySpace user profiles through one of the ad-supported sites, MySpacePrivateProfile.com -- a process he says took about 94 hours. He rolled those images into a single file and seeded it to The Pirate Bay, a popular BitTorrent tracking site, on Sunday, advertising it as "pictures taken exclusively from private profiles."
Despite the language, the script DMaul posted to TribalWar does not appear to discriminate between public and private profiles, making it likely that many of the photos were intended to be public. The script cycled through MySpace users sequentially by MySpace Friend ID number, and did not target users of a particular age group.
Even with some public photos in the mix, the haul represents a significant breach that affects users under 16 -- whose profiles are automatically set to private -- more than older users who must opt-in to the privacy option.
As of Wednesday morning, The Pirate Bay showed two users seeding the file, and another 40 downloading it. One commenter complained that the download could take "weeks or months" to complete, prompting another to predict that, "By the end of the week it should be well distributed."
DMaul made two smaller files available as direct downloads. One of them examined by Wired News contains more than 32,000 images ranging from the mundane to the intimate: vacation photos, infants in bathtubs, teenagers mugging for the camera.
Child-safety advocate Parry Aftab, executive director at WiredSafety.org (not affiliated with Wired News) said last week that MySpace and other social networking sites should have teams that do nothing but test for bugs and monitor web forums for discussions about privacy glitches.
Last week, MySpace chief security officer Hemanshu Nigam touted a deal with the attorneys general of 49 states in which MySpace agreed to a laundry list of safety improvements on the site. However, the settlement does not require MySpace to detect or promptly close its recurring security holes.
MySpace hasn't returned phone calls on the issue. A spokeswoman for Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, co-chairman of the task force that forged the pact with MySpace, declined to comment on the bug this week. Noelle Talley, a spokeswoman for North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper, the other co-chair, noted MySpace's quick response in closing the bug after Wired News reported on it.
"We raised this particular issue with MySpace and they told us that the problem was fixed by the next day," Talley wrote in an e-mail. "We'll follow up with them on this issue."
"The process set up by our agreement gives us ready access to bring problems to the attention of MySpace," Talley added. "We believe this collaborative effort will move us more quickly toward safer social networking sites, but attorneys general won't hesitate to take further action if necessary."
MySpace plugged a similar security hole in August 2006 when it made the front page of Digg, four months after it surfaced.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
Twarrior
|
Date: January 26, 2008 @ 6:43 AM
Yeah, I submitted this article -- but I'm still bookmarking it for prosperity. lol
Myspace lovers have totally blown the whole Facebook incident out of proportion as the minor oversight doesn't even affect 98% of the people on Facebook.
So you've got more gossip than fact with "oh Facebook is insecure blah blah blah" when Facebook is one of the most secure social networking sites I've ever seen. It's not a perfect site but what site can be perfect when we live in a universe that allows for flaws, mistakes and over sights?
I think anyone on this Earth that expects perfection of people and / or things is one clueless ignoramus.
Myspace has been an unstable POS for years now. Sadly, the main reason lots of people like Myspace and hate Facebook is because Facebook has prioritized on function where as Myspace has prioritized on eye candy.
You can not as of yet change the color scheme of a Facebook profile and Myspace has been able to allow this for years. Perhaps the average Myspace lover tricks themselves into thinking that Myspace is secure and Facebook is not because they just love their eye candy too much to do otherwise.
-Dave |
|
Twarrior
|
Date: January 26, 2008 @ 6:49 AM
"The creator of the file says he compiled the photos earlier this month using the MySpace security hole that Wired News reported on last week. That hole, still unacknowledged by the News Corporation-owned site, allowed voyeurs to peek inside the photo galleries of some MySpace users who had set their profiles to "private," despite MySpace's assurances that such images could only be seen by people on a user's friends' list."
Before I knew about Facebook I knew about this exploit. I have a Myspace account only for those instances where someone wants to show me something and it requires authentication.
I also used to have a few pictures up there. Well, whether it was to show non-myspace users those pictures (or) I was unable to login to my own myspace profile and someone else wanted to show me some pics -- I would use this exploit to show the pics and / or allow others to show me pics.
Now -- though I never thought someone would become bored enough to go on a photo raping and pillaging mission -- I still think it's pretty amusing. lol
-Dave |
|
Twarrior
|
Date: January 26, 2008 @ 6:56 AM
Another side note -- as far as public versus private -- please, it's the Internet. If you upload content to a server that you do not own and have no direct control of -- you've just released it to the public regardless of privacy settings. Just as private email isn't really private because it passes through various third parties.
It's amazing how grown adults still seem to touch fire and then act shocked when they get burned. lol
Sorry, I'm i a bit of a ranting mood. lol ... oh and by the way -- before I forget to mention it -- this article was forwarded to me via AIM by my friend Stacy Reed who works at Tucows. I just wanted to make sure she was properly credited. She's also a Deviant Artist ( http://sya.deviantart.com/art/Slave-to-the-RIAA-2069813 ) and a BRIAA supporter for years now.
-Dave |
|
independentm...
|
Date: January 26, 2008 @ 11:38 PM
Say hi to Stacy for us! |
|
independentm...
|
Date: January 27, 2008 @ 1:24 AM
I personally like Facebook a hell of a lot better than MySpace too, (although I do forsee it eventually becoming cluttered by all the "widgets")
======
Tom Hodgkinson, writing at the Guardian, however. sees Facebook as utterly evil.
It's an entertaining read, and he's probably right about much of what he says, however, DO realize the guy is wearing a bigger tin-foil hat than even the one I own. lol |
|
|