|
Anti-Napster Organizations Sign Brief
With Napster's October court date soon to arrive, parties interested in the trial have been filing Friend of the Court briefs by truckloads.
The idea is that information they provide will help sway the court's overall judgment one way or another.
First we heard about the people and organizations that were pro-Napster, but now it's time for the anti-Napster people to rear their ugly heads. The filing of Friend of the Court briefs took place last week when twenty organizations signed a "Napster should be banned" declaration.
Now I can see why organizations like the Motion Picture Association of America and the Software and Information Industry Association would have an interest in protecting their copyrights and perhaps fear that Napster might change some laws with their new technology, but I don't see where the National Basketball Association and the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball fit into this whole digital era. (They too signed the "lets ban Napster" declaration.)
The Friends of the Court who signed the anit-Napster ban are: the Motion Picture Association of America, the Software and Information Industry Association, the American Film Marketing Association, the Association of American Publishers, the American Society of Media Photographers, the Professional Photographers Association, the Graphic Artists Guild, the Interactive Digital Software Association, the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Broadcast Music, the Producers Guild of America, the Directors Guild of America, the Writers Guild of America, the American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, Reed Elsevier, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, the National Basketball Association, the Songwriters Guild of America, and Amsong.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
milladrive
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 10:03 AM
Wow, look at all that money. I bet that the pro-Napster Friends of the Court have a whole lot less organization, power, and influence. :)
Right now, I'm about to email the Vice-Pesident of Legal and Business Affairs at Madison Square Garden, who also happens to be close friend, to see if he has any insight into how the NBA (or sports, in general) got involved. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 10:07 AM
sports get involved because they are broadcast just like movies and shows. |
|
milladrive
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 10:21 AM
You know, now that I think about it, I can't believe that not one of these organizations is willing to embrace this wonderful new distribution system and spend any energy on coming up w/a new business model that would be beneficial to all. |
|
milladrive
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 10:25 AM
Yeah, you could be right. The broadcasts are copyrighted, therefore they have an interest. |
|
MMnMM
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 10:59 AM
The NBA puts out compilation discs with various rapper and player collaborations just like any other artist does. They also have dvd and vcr tapes for sale so obviuosly they would have an opinion on it. You probably werent even aware that the wwf just did a ban on napster 2 weeks ago that banned anybody that was sharing wwf songs. You think that if you are not in the music industry then you dont have business to be lost or gained. Come on people please do your homework. |
|
pressf8
|
Date: September 11, 2000 @ 11:12 PM
and they would be losing money how? They got paid, and they aren't rebroadcasting it or selling it on DVD--so what's the problem with people encoding baseball games?
Brian |
|
B00MER
|
Date: September 12, 2000 @ 9:45 AM
Ban napster, even if it does happen, there thousands of other ways to preview before buying.
I'm just sick of hearing about the RIAA and Napster.
Ban it or shutup RIAA!!!!
PLEASE! |
|
B00MER
|
Date: September 12, 2000 @ 9:47 AM
werd... hrmm yuma.army.mil?
*gives the man the bird*
phuck the army. |
|
jopsphil
|
Date: March 8, 2005 @ 1:26 AM
i want to be a member of napster |
|
|