|
FLIPR plans for "legal" file sharing
Flipr (Future License of Intellectual Property Registry) issued a press release today, reporting they are working on creating a "legal" file sharing application.
FLIPR stated that they are working on building a collection of legitimate files, they control and compensating copyright holders for the use of these files through their service.
The file sharing application with FLIPR is reported to have built features built in capabilities to track intellectual properties of various file formats, such as audio, video, pictures and text files. This would allow FLIPR to accurately compensate a copyright holder for the use of their copyright files through the service.
From my understanding, the idea behind the service is the ability FLIPR has built into the file sharing application to embed advertisements, driven by the content the user selects to obtain through the service. This would allow FLIPR to establish a business model to allow income to compensate copyright holders for the use of their files.
FLIPR will offer a basic version of this application for free, with the option of a high-end subscription run version of the application also available.
What I am curious to know, is how the auditing system of such a file sharing application works? Would the copyright holder have the ability to self audit such a service to ensure that they are getting adequately compensated for the use of their files, or is this done on a "trust" basis (something which I highly doubt in this industry).
Whatever the case is with regards to auditing of the files shared through the service, it appears FLIPR will be making more "official" announcements about this in the upcoming weeks, hopefully answering some of these questions.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
-X-
|
Date: September 29, 2000 @ 5:51 AM
I agree, and in reporting their press release exactly as they put it, I feel like an ass now in retrospect. I think they are onto the right track with this idea, but condemning everyone who uses file sharing applications by stating this is a legal alternative is a bit of jumping to conclusions. As a reporter, I do see the trickyness in trying to word this correctly.. File sharing legallity is open issue, and there are quite a few cases out there now working on deciding exactly how legal or illegal they are..
|
|
Anonymous
|
Date: September 29, 2000 @ 7:02 AM
Personally I dont think that advertising will produce enough revenue for them to pay off all the royalties. Also .. I will stick with napster and scour until any other system is proven, and a lot of the people Ive talked to about this say the same. I dont use real player because of the dodgy way it tracks your listening habits etc (not to mention the aureate .dll 'problem') - call me paranoid .. but if FLIPR can find out who is listening to what when, then who is to stop them pulling a bit more information from users computers and selling direct marketing to the record companies. Now THAT would pay for royalties ... |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 2, 2000 @ 7:53 AM
thank you flipr. finally someone has got the idea. artists will no longer need to go to record companies to create and distribute thier music and we can phase out the whole industry. music should be free for those who love it and there are ways of making that so it without harming the artists. let the advertisers pay for it. and trust me they will. |
|
|