|
Bertelsmann AG and Napster come to terms
Bertelsmann AG and Napster, Inc. announced plans today for a strategic alliance to establish an industry accepted community person-to-person file sharing service.
It seems that Napster and Bertelsmann AG’s newly formed eCommerce Group, BeCG, have developed a new business model for Napster with a secure membership-based service that will provide payments to rightsholders while preserving the quality of the file sharing service.
Napster and Bertelsmann will be actively seeking support from others in the music industry for this new alliance to bring membership based digital music distribution to the masses, something which the community has shown it is willing to accept as a viable means of digital distribution of music.
Under the new agreement with Bertelsmann, once Napster has successfully implemented a subscription model to its popular file sharing services, all pending litigation from BMG against the company will be dropped. BMG will then legally allow Napster the use of its music catalogue through the service.
Bertelsmann AG’s eCommerce Group is reported to be financially backing this transition to a subscription model for Napster, in exchange for the ability to acquire a portion of Napster’s equity in the future.
Here are a few quotes from several major players in this groundbreaking announcement from Napster and Bertelsmann AG concerning this agreement:
“Person-to-person file sharing has captured the imagination of millions of people worldwide with its ease of use, global selection of content, and community features. Napster has pointed the way for a new direction for music distribution, and we believe it will form the basis of important and exciting new business models for the future of the music industry. We invite other record and publishing companies, artists and other industry members to participate in the development of a secure and membership-based service.” - Thomas Middelhoff, Bertelsmann’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Hank Barry, CEO of Napster, said, “This strategic alliance with Bertelsmann is the right next step for Napster. The Napster community — which is the fastest-growing in the history of the Internet — will benefit enormously from Bertelsmann’s historic commitment to innovation and its experience in offering a seamless and convenient user experience.”
Andreas Schmidt, President and CEO of Bertelsmann eCommerce Group, said, “Our strategic alliance with Napster is key to providing consumers in the future with access to the largest global music catalogue of high quality music files -- with added convenience and features. We will work closely with Napster to establish a new membership-based service that achieves acceptance by other music providers. For recording artists and songwriters, we hope to realize Napster’s full potential as a promotional vehicle while protecting their interests. For the recording industry, we are looking to take a positive and forward-looking approach with a membership-based service that complements other forms of music distribution.”
Shawn Fanning, founder of Napster, said: “I am excited that Bertelsmann appreciates and values the uniqueness of the community Napster users have built. I look forward to Napster becoming a part of even more people’s lives, helping the way people discover and explore music.”
Strauss Zelnick, President and CEO, BMG Entertainment, said: “Bertelsmann’s forward-thinking approach will enable the new Napster membership-based file sharing service to become an important community for artists, record companies and consumers. BMG, as a leader in the online space, supports an array of secure, digital distribution alternatives that respects copyrights, including file sharing, downloads and subscription services."
With the announcement, it looks like it is going to be a good treat for Halloween for Napster, and could prove to be quite a trick to a lot of the recording industry. Perhaps this announcement will be the wake up call to some in the industry that digital distribution of music _is_ the way of the future, and now is the time to get involved with that future and stop simply fighting the inevitable.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 12:34 PM
Memebership based *secure* file sharing? Are they on crack?
All we need is one playback and it _will_ be free. Screw the subscription. And screw Napster.
|
|
digitaldoughty
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 3:39 PM
I can just see it now, my download chices will be The Bay City Rollers, Styx and Barbara Streisand.
No, seriously, this is a step in the right direction. it pisses me off when people call Napster sellouts. It'c called creating a viable business model that allows you to to sustain business - it has nothing to do with selling out. |
|
milladrive
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 3:49 PM
"I can just see it now, my download chices will be The Bay City Rollers, Styx and Barbara Streisand."
Um, of the 3, only the 1st has anything to do w/BMG, and even that's by proxy ... they're on Arista. Oh, and some early Styx stuff was on RCA. Blah, blah, blah, I knew what'cha meant, though. :) |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 4:00 PM
Napster, Inc. is a sell out. All for-profit companies are. There is nothing wrong with this. Does anyone actually think Napster is doing this for the better of man-kind? They are doing this to get filthy IPO rich. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 4:11 PM
"Napster, Inc. is a sell out. All for-profit companies are. "
are you retarded? who wants to work for free?
jackass |
|
tobyslater
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 4:36 PM
Stop complaining and see how this is good news. Napster was not your dream Freenet anti-establishment anti-copyright system. It's a big corporate behemoth with shareholders and investment and all that stuff. So the only way for our beloved Napster to survive was for it to team up with all those nasty record labels. We can now pay a subscription fee for access to all our chosen tracks plus the knowledge that money is being ploughed into improving the application.
This is good news.... wait and see though, there's no way that BMG will get permission to use the SONGWRITING / publishing rights in the tracks for this service.
http://www.tobyslater.com |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 5:02 PM
Why do you think I am "retarded?" Didn't I say there is nothing wrong with it? |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 5:05 PM
Napster is going DOWN,
Traitor |
|
iDave
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 5:17 PM
hmmmm............ |
|
pressf8
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 5:20 PM
I think a subscription service like this that still allows for trading of random files is FAR better than the $2.50/download (in secure, crappy format) that the labels have been proposing so far...
far better... I really hope this works out to something cool and legally sound.
Brian |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 6:08 PM
I am willing to pay a fee for use of napster if it's not to much. Its better than loosing it all together. theonly thing that i am wondering is with these big record companies getting thier hands in this are we still going to have the freedom that we do now?? will we be able to download complete albums or just what is allowed. if it doesn't change for the worse i'll pay.. |
|
itirep
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 7:09 PM
i agree with the earlier thought that this will be ok if the files are there for the downloading.according to napster's own records more than 80% of it's users polled say they will no longer share if they have to pay and if the industry has to provide-then the price for subscription will just keep going up and up.
|
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 8:11 PM
The only thing that is going to happen is that people will download from someone else, who doesn´t charge for it. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 8:50 PM
Fuck Napster and the scmucks at BMG!! |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 8:53 PM
EVERYBODY!! GIVE NAPSTER THE FINGER!!
So they decided to sell out and stab all of their faithful users by getting into bed with those bastards at the RIAA = well FUCK 'EM!!
MP3 music will always be FREE!
|
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 8:53 PM
WASSSUP WIT DAT!?! How about all those songs that don't belong to a certain record label. Like theme songs or songs from artists that don't belong to record labels. What are they gonna do? Or can we still download songs off other people's hard drives? If we are limited to the certain amount of songs we can download then I probably will stop using Napster and use some other free peer to peer program. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: October 31, 2000 @ 9:40 PM
I THINK THATS ALL CRAP!!! napster just officially sold out like them gay metallica freaks did to them.... |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 2:18 AM
Mp3s will always be free...just wait Napster will be replaced shortly. No one is ever going to pay for napster. |
|
RyanS
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 5:29 AM
I agree that MP3 will always be free. There are other file sharing programs out there, Scour Exchange for instance. It's usage has increased dramatically in the past few months because of the Napster scare. But sooner or later these programs will be in the hot seat just like Napster is now. They'll either follow suit with a subscription base or just shut down. If all else fails, we might just resort to the "ancient" methods of retrieving our songs (FTP, IRC, etc.)
I do however disagree that no one will pay for Napster. Depending on the cost, availability, and quantity of dowloads, it could work. Just too early to tell how Napster will settle with this. Just keep our fingers (and other body parts) crossed to see how this will pan out. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 7:27 AM
One Word:
Freenet
(: |
|
milladrive
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 8:54 AM
I agree that it's simply too soon to tell. There are WAY too many issues up in the air to know for certain how it will turn out.
1st of all, it's only 1 of 5 major companies. What about he other 4, plus the 1000's of independents, plus the millions of unsigned artists?
2nd, nobody will pay for Napster if it maintains the status quo. One way I see success for this sorta agreement is if Napster can guarantee quality, and not limit our dl options to only trax controlled by labels in cahoots w/Napster.
I think it's good that a record label is finally trying to work w/a file sharing app rather than attempt to extinguish it, but I'm a little wary of Napster's intentions. We shall see. |
|
milladrive
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 8:57 AM
Uhh-huh. Go try to find a 50-year-old song on Freenet. ;) |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 11:46 AM
For those optimistic people who says it´s a good news:
Napster plan not only to ask you to pay monthly fees but it you will also have limited monthly downloading trafic.
|
|
spyed
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 2:23 PM
Half their users means they still have .. what... 14 million?
Assuming half their users is accurate, we're talking about $840 million in yearly revenues.
I'd sell out too =) |
|
spyed
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 2:23 PM
$5.
1/3 of a CD. |
|
spyed
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 2:24 PM
How 'bout... no.. scott. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 5:49 PM
Is it just me or does Napster-boy Fanning look like a real pussy in that picture? |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 1, 2000 @ 9:00 PM
Pay to use Napster when there are other similar programs? Hahahaha
Well nice try to make money off the masses. But unless they can offer something VERY unique and different, I don't see myself coughing up the monthly fees.
Napster is only good when enough people support it, and although it has some unique features such as picking the bitrate, all this is useless IF THE FANS DONT SUPPORT NAPSTER! |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:23 AM
Napster has gone a long way towards showing how the web can be used for distribution. The whole "free" thing created a lot of excitement, but how are the artists of the future and the people creating all this technology today supposed to make a living if they just give everything away forever? Get real, people. It's a business, like everything else. If you think "selling out" means to become part of a working system then you obviously have never done anything important to affect change. Making a living and working with the powers that be is not what I call "selling out". I call that "smart" and effective. Anything else is arguably "martyrdom".
a. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:31 AM
THis is a bunch of shit napster should be free as in freenet but those damn cry babies just want to make a penny. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:53 AM
if napster had started out as a subscription service that would have been different but they didn't! they started out as freeware! and it IS selling out!!!!!!!! |
|
Fletch
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 12:51 PM
a 45-employee "corporate behemoth" ? |
|
milladrive
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 8:20 PM
Hey! ... Mankind! ... take a good look above at what'chu've produced!
Well, Dr. Freud, it looks like the cognitive programming has been a complete success. Doctor, if only you'd been around at the same time as Darwin, this might be a whole different story. Now we've gotta start this whole reprogramming process all over again.
If you take a moment and go back thru the articles of past coupla months, you'll be quite fascinated to find all sorts of ideas as to how an artist in the future can make a respectable living. Art is way too business, if ya ask me. That "working system" you speak of worx for a REAL select few.
Call it what'cha want, but if that post represents your current opinion, then you're the 1 who needs to contemplate just how much important change you've been affecting. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 8:29 PM
I agree! I a lot of people who use Napster still buy CDs. I'm one of those people. I doubt many people will be willing to pay a monthy fee and I don't want to do so if I'm not going to find the music I want. Napster's going down the tubes thanks to these record labels-as if they don't make enough money already! |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:18 PM
Who Gives a damed, Freenet's already here.
www.freenetproject.org
-MikeeUSA- |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:55 PM
I'm afraid the number of users Napster will loose is much more than 50% -- more like 90%. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:57 PM
Damn right |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 9:59 PM
Gnutella is unstoppable!! |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 2, 2000 @ 10:14 PM
Freenet Is Encrypted, Truely Anonymous, Extreemly subversive, un-traceable, AND Unstoppable.
Oh v 0.3.4 is out and is very nice!
-MikeeUSA- |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: November 3, 2000 @ 3:29 PM
napster sucks! they shoiuld have gone down as a martyr, not a sellout |
|
|