|
SMDI Threatens Legal Action
Back in September of 1999, the Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI) held a $10,000 contest challenging computer pros to hack into copyright protection technologies. Now those computer aces, who foiled four different copyright protection technologies, are being asked by the record companies to suppress their findings.
Professor Edward Felten and his academic hacking group from Princeton University were the ones who answered SDMI's challenge and now they have been threatened with legal action if they go through with plans to reveal how they cracked the anti-piracy codes. The group had planned to reveal the results of their efforts later this week at the Fourth International Information-Hiding Workshop in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania but now those plans are on hold.
Earlier this month, Felten received a letter from SDMI and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) urging him to refrain from discussing his findings or face potential legal action. "Any disclosure of information gained from participating in the Public Challenge would be outside the scope of activities permitted by the Agreement and could subject you and your research team to actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ..." stated the letter.
SDMI had hoped their challenge was a way to foolproof their anti-piracy efforts before adopting it as an industry wide standard.
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
aleksyandr
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 3:06 AM
Let's see.. these hackers crack this technology, and THEN the people who challenged them to crack it, try to stop them from releasing how they did it.
Why? So they can release this technology anyway? Doesn't sound very good if it's already been hacked. :)
These people spend so much time trying to make money off music, they don't even know what music is about anymore.
Aleksyandr http://www.aleksyandr.com
============
Maybe thats the way you live your life but I know, life, it dont always live that way. -Seal |
|
Q-Logic
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 12:38 PM
I wonder if these people realize that anything can be cracked. Nothing can be 100% foolproof. What is sad is that it takes years to make stuff like this and only a couple of days to break it apart and crack it. What a vicious cycle for the people who spend millions of dollars, time, effort, and energy into the project. |
|
premise
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 4:35 PM
HAHAHAHAHHA
I think this is GREAT! Although the 'legal action' is a lame attempt to supress the knowledge because if its not allowed to be known publicly, the info will be avail. in the underground for sure.
Although they try, they cannot stop information or hackers/crackers. It's a battle they will constantly lose but refuse to admit to.
Im actually very SICK of all these 'Associations' that think they are the ones who make the golden rules on everything, think I'll start my own.
I swear this country/world needs a big PEOPLES REVOLT and we need to take back what is rightfully ours, life. Im so tired of hearing what some rich old fart idiot THINKS are MY rights to certain things and information. Just so sick of it. Our society is destined to remain in the STONE AGE, why? cause theres more money and 'rules' involved. The future is bad for business.
Screw this, I'm starting a civil war damnit. email me to join the revolution! :) |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 8:43 PM
I hurt to burst everyone's bubble, but it sounds like this is a perfectly legit action. It would appear that the research group signed an agreement and part of that agreement a limition on releasing their findings. Oh well. |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 8:43 PM
I hurt to burst everyone's bubble, but it sounds like this is a perfectly legit action. It would appear that the research group signed an agreement and part of that agreement was a limition on releasing their findings. Oh well. |
|
Scyth
|
Date: April 25, 2001 @ 11:12 PM
According to The Register [http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/8/18434.html], the research team decided that the argeement was to0 restrictive and so decided not to accept it (and therefore not to formally participate in the HackSDMI challenge). |
|
Anonymous
|
Date: April 27, 2001 @ 7:56 PM
Like the guy up top said, nothing is foolproof. Don't ever challenge a hacker by saying its impossible to do something. Where there is a will, there is a way. I think that those smart hackers should piss on the letter and post it anyway. |
|
|