Username:
Password:






 
The RIAA police
Posted by Jon Newton on July 17, 2003 at 4:55 PM   (printer friendly)

Once in a while we come across something that's just so right-on that we can't resist featuring it in full.

For the record, boycott new CD’s, by Steve Stajich, a Santa Monica Mirror contributing writer, is one of those.

Read it and roll (around the floor : )

======================

Any day now somebody is going to start publishing a magazine called When Music Was Cool. Fans of MOJO magazine might argue that publication has taken the lead, with articles that provide deep background on bygone, mostly dead rock artists. It’s a kind of 'Rolling Stone: Time Tunnel Edition.'

What I think will drive new publications about old rock is that the mainstream record industry, especially as represented by the repressive RIAA, is eating itself alive. The prognosis is not good.

The RIAA or Recording Industry Association of America is described on one anti-RIAA website as 'a killer octopus whose tentacles are always reaching out for prey'. That prey would be us, the music fans, and even the recording artists themselves.' (Personally, I prefer the more compact moniker 'suits.') Edgy artists like Sheryl 'I’ll be appearing at the new Albertsons store” Crow and The Dixie Chicks, who now check weather forecasts before taking a stand, have put their signatures on RIAA anti-file swapping threats.

Yeah, that’s right. Threats. The record industry should theoretically be one of the most open-minded and progressive industries in America. Their products are essentially messages of love, poetry and freedom, personal and otherwise. Songs are reflective creative works that probe the human soul.

But at this moment in entertainment history, the RIAA prefers to function as a police force ready to push down doors to nail anyone copying a music file. In newspapers across the nation, they’ve printed full-page announcements of their intent to sue private file-swapping citizens.

The record industry ignored computer music technology, didn’t bother to stabilize its position in that cosmos, and is now litigating instead of building bridges to the 21st century. Coming after the industry’s long and proud history of screwing artists — notoriously in blues and rhythm and blues — out of royalties and payments and credits, it’s time that consumers sent their own full-page message back to the RIAA.

Simply do not buy any new compact discs for one year. Boycott new CD’s until July 4, 2004 … Independence Day.

I’m asking you to do this for the clean, crisp, refreshing feeling that comes when you stop contributing to repressive capitalism. It won’t necessarily change the RIAA’s bad attitude. Looking at our planet right now, the RIAA might not seem a priority. But why submit to being pushed around and played like a harmonica by corporate entities so consumed with profit margins that they actually choke their own customers over alternative technology issues?

I apologize to artists that are, in fact, hurt by file swapping. They won’t like you boycotting new product for a year, either. But exactly where do consumers enter the dialogue here? How would you like to be sued by Sony Pictures because you didn’t go see the 'Charlie’s Angels' sequel and instead borrowed a friend’s old VHS copy of a good movie?

For one year, instead of contributing money to an industry that has loudly announced that YOU are the enemy, buy used CDs or burn copies of a friend’s CD or make cassette tapes or get CDs at your neighbor’s yard sale or turn on a radio or play your old LP records or wind up a music box or play a guitar or beat the daylights out of your congas or whistle. Utilize any of the alternative sources of music that are, at the time of this writing, still legal in America.

Remind the RIAA that it needs you.


User Comments (These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)

thepick  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 5:13 PM
What an excellent idea. Done and done.

goldenpi  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 5:58 PM
Needs additional publicity.

dook  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 6:55 PM
It does need more publicity. I call on everyone to help with the boycott by taking articles like these and posting them all over the net or in a mass email campain. We need a voice! We need to take this into our hands! Ive post eairlier articles where ever I can. Just be courtious when doing so, we dont need to look pushy to the unaware peoples, we need to get this message out. Lets fight!

gdZiemann  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 7:27 PM
I'm certainly going to reprint it. More voices. More exposure. More power. Our numbers grow each day and with each imbecilic move by the RIAA.

We WILL win.

Gottagetsome...  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 8:07 PM
The RIAA acts more and more like a terrorist group daily with their threats, lies, and outright swindling of the artists they claim they're trying to protect.

I fully agree with this move....but rather than simply not buying new CDs for one year, don't buy any new CDs EVER. Lord knows there's plenty of used ones out there for dirt cheap - just got a bunch of used ones myself.

CodeWarrior  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 8:26 PM
Gottagetsome- I agree..see my post @
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/7166

BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS!

iH8RIAA  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 8:35 PM
What we need to do is make the RIAA sound like a terrorist group, even call it one in our writings. It's like calling spyware programs (the ones KaZaA is notorious for having) trojan horse viruses. The psycological effect will be much higher and the antiRIAA movement will go faster. ;)

CodeWarrior  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 8:47 PM
We don't have to make the RIAA sound like a terrorist group...they are making themselves into one...harassment, intimidation, causing economic hardship, etc.
RIAA=Repulsive Idiots Acting like Assholes

ronnie71  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 8:55 PM
if DMusic would make it where artist could print some of these stories or maybe a mission statement i know we wouldnt mind passing them out at gigs and stuff..and also people who know bands could make the indipendent musicians aware of the things that are going to happen and will happen. We live in a great time. I tell the other guys in the band I love modern technology because it is a great resouce to independents. Independents are third in market share in the United States cant wait for the day when we are the number one.

Ronnie Patterson
http://kwiver.dmusic.com

eaglesniper  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 9:01 PM
Dig this: Two of the so-called Big 5 fighting each other! EPIC!

Bertelsmann Seeks Dismissal of Napster-Related Suits
By Sue Zeidler

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - German media company Bertelsmann AG (news - web sites) (BERT.UL) said on Thursday it had filed a motion to dismiss three lawsuits that allege it perpetuated copyright infringement to the tune of billions of dollars by funding the Napster (news - web sites) music-swapping service.

Bertelsmann said the motion it filed in Manhattan federal court on Thursday argues that recent court opinions counter allegations by Vivendi Universal's (NYSE:V - news) (EAUG.PA) Universal Music Group, EMI Group Plc (news - web sites) (EMI.L) and music publishers that its entities were "vicarious" and "contributory" copyright infringers.

Bertelsmann said in a statement that U.S. copyright law does not permit recovery from a third-party lender for damages the plaintiffs failed to recover from Napster.

EMI, Universal and the music publishers all responded on Thursday by saying they intended to proceed with the case.

EMI in June became the second big record label to join the $17 billion legal fight brought by music publishers against Bertelsmann, following a similar suit by Universal in May.

All three suits accused Bertelsmann of perpetuating Napster's success by investing more than $100 million in the service in 2000 and 2001.

The labels and publishers have until mid-August to respond in court to the motion, said a lawyer familiar with the case.

When Bertelsmann invested in the song-swap pioneer in 2000, it originally said it wanted to build Napster -- which at its peak attracted some 60 million users -- as a legitimate music subscription service.

BLAME FOR SLUMP IN SALES

But after a federal court ruled the service ran afoul of copyright laws, Napster was shut down in 2001, and it declared bankruptcy last year. The music industry has blamed services like Napster and several similar networks for much of the recent slump in record sales.

Bertelsmann's BMG subsidiary was one of the major labels involved in the lawsuit that contributed to Napster's demise.

"This case is based on a mountain of evidence demonstrating that Bertelsmann acted in concert with Napster in supporting its infringing operations and keeping it alive despite the fact that its record label subsidiary, BMG, was simultaneously suing Napster for what its own attorney described as the worst case of copyright infringement in history," said Carey Ramos, a lawyer for the music publishers.

Universal, the world's biggest record label, said it was disingenuous for Bertelsmann to suggest it should not be liable for Napster's conduct.

"Bertelsmann did not merely provide a loan to Napster; nor was it merely a passive investor in Napster. Bertelsmann took control of the Napster system and directly and materially contributed to the infringing activities of the Napster users," Universal said in a statement.

"EMI stands firm in its belief that we have a strong case against Bertelsmann. By investing both millions of dollars and management resources in Napster ... Bertelsmann enabled and encouraged the wholesale theft of copyrighted music," EMI said in a statement.

CD-burning software company Roxio Inc. (Nasdaq:ROXI - news) has more recently purchased the assets of Napster and plans in coming months to reestablish it as a legitimate pay-for-use service.

Gottagetsome...  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 9:22 PM
Code - love your definiation of RIAA!

I couldn't help but LOL when I saw the article on 2 of the Big Five suing each other. With any luck, maybe the RIAA will eat itself. LOL

Kamau  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 10:57 PM
Good message!! I wanted to purchase a Sony DRU510A DVD burner because I believe that it is one of the best on the market, but after some soul-searching, I've decided on the Pioneer DVR-A05. Why? Because I don't want to give my money to one of the top backers of the MPAA/RIAA clowns!!!!!!!

Jazzmary2U  
Date: July 17, 2003 @ 11:32 PM
Right on!...also, support local live artist by attending their shows in small, non Clearchannel, venues. And don't forget to buy independant!! And don't forget to get all your elegible file-sharing buddies to register to vote. Polish that third finger for pulling the levers on that voting machine...ARE YOU REGISTERED AND READY?

thumbtack  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 12:29 AM
Yeah I can't wait to hear the ROCK THE VOTE ads this year...the very people they are trying to jail are the people who will be coming of votaing age in eithe rtheir first or second election

motorpsycho  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 5:40 AM
How about making some sort of sticker for the independent labels, that clearly shows they're not members of RIAA. It would make it much easier to find the music I "could" buy without breaking the boycott. Just a thought....

independentm...  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 7:44 AM
"Good message!! I wanted to purchase a Sony DRU510A DVD burner because I believe that it is one of the best on the market, but after some soul-searching, I've decided on the Pioneer DVR-A05. Why? Because I don't want to give my money to one of the top backers of the MPAA/RIAA clowns!!!!!!!"

Good choise Kamau, the Sony player is most likely loaded with some kind of copy protection technology that you wouldn't want. Pioneer might have it too (due to the the damn DMCA) but at least Pioneer would be less happy about having it I think... or maybe I am thinking of Phillips? Oh, well. Burn in happiness! (By the way, under the Home Recording Act, unfortunately, you are STILL paying the industry via a hidden "value added" tax that is on every recording device and media you buy... I think that applies to DVD stuff. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.)

Shmoo, of Electric Gypsy

Support Local and Independent Music!

CodeWarrior  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 9:05 AM
independentm... great point, and I admire that you even considered this deal with the RIAA in choosing which burner to buy. The tax on CDs is another wrongheaded tax...
Very good points!

SUPPORT INDIE MUSIC AND ELECTRIC GYPSY!
BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS!

CodeWarrior2003  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 9:38 AM
The RIAA are committing online terror, plain and simple. If KaZaa and the rest declare their services off limits to the RIAA and the copyright bots,
they can invoke USC TITLE 18,Part 1, Chapter 121, Sec. 2701, since the RIAA would be accessing the network of users without permission and this is a violation, to access stored electonic communications without authorization.
There is the assumption in law that only people with "clean hands" should sue. Violation of federal law by them and their minions would dirty their hands!
http://www.bowie-jensen.com/computerlaw/18usc2701.html
BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS! BAN THE BASTARDS!

CodeWarrior2003  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 9:39 AM
Section 2701. Unlawful access to stored communications

(a) Offense. - Except as provided in subsection (c) of this
section whoever -
(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility
through which an electronic communication service is provided; or
(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that
facility;
and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a
wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage
in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of
this section.
(b) Punishment. - The punishment for an offense under subsection
(a) of this section is -
(1) if the offense is committed for purposes of commercial
advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial
gain -
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than
one year, or both, in the case of a first offense under this
subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than
two years, or both, for any subsequent offense under this
subparagraph; and
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than
six months, or both, in any other case.
(c) Exceptions. - Subsection (a) of this section does not apply
with respect to conduct authorized -
(1) by the person or entity providing a wire or electronic
communications service;
(2) by a user of that service with respect to a communication
of or intended for that user; or
(3) in section 2703, 2704 or 2518 of this title.


theHERMlT  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 9:54 AM
July 4th 2004 simply is not a strong enough stance. I'm not finished boycotting these "suits" until laws are changed that bridge the gap between the last millenium and this one. I think invasion of internet privacy is at risk, and that sharing ideas and art is the very essence and foundation of the internet. I'm going to boycott the RIAA on my deathbed until things are changed. And if that means I have to stay in this cramped 30gig harddrive, so be it!!!

CodeWarrior2003  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 9:58 AM
RIGHT ON THEHERMIT !
Don't clock the rock!
BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS! BAN THE BASTARDS!

wabbitman  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 10:41 AM
Guess I got it bad.
I just rebuilt my old CD burner rather than purchasing a new one. It only saved me about $10,but the RIAA got NOTHING.
I'm doing business like this from now on.
I just wish now, I could buy blank CD's without giving those pin-heads at the RIAA money.

WABBITMAN

goldenpi  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 11:20 AM
You can. Only audio cd-r requires the payment, not data CD-r. The difference is that audio CDr has a serial number written on it, and will work in audio-only burners (of which there are very few). A data cd-r has no serial and will not work in those writers.

CodeWarrior  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 12:06 PM
DirecTV dragnet snares innocent techies
By Kevin Poulsen, SecurityFocus Jul 17 2003 1:15AM

In recent months the satellite TV giant has filed nearly 9,000 federal
lawsuits against people who've purchased signal piracy devices. But
some of those devices have legitimate uses, and innocent computer
geeks are getting caught in the crackdown.

jusedawg  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 12:52 PM
hrosen@riaa.com, sdonofrio@riaa.com, fcreighton@riaa.com, jbetts@riaa.com, sfabrizio@riaa.com, jflatow@riaa.com, dincorvaia@riaa.com, jbendall@riaa.com, clawhorn@riaa.com, jhenkel@riaa.com, lpelliccia@riaa.com, jberman@riaa.com, csherman@riaa.com, nashby@riaa.com, lbocchi@riaa.com, pbrooks@riaa.com, jegas@riaa.com, jfleming@riaa.com, jganoe@riaa.com, hkim@riaa.com, smarks@riaa.com, hmccaffrey@riaa.com, jmilbauer@riaa.com, rmorgan@riaa.com, moppenheim@riaa.com, mpetersen@riaa.com, brobinson@riaa.com, lsalet@riaa.com, msimcik@riaa.com, tsites@riaa.com, dstebbings@riaa.com, btenor@riaa.com, nturkewitz@riaa.com, dvaldez@riaa.com, awalsh@riaa.com, fwalters@riaa.com, jwhitehead@riaa.com, wyascur@riaa.com

Or send to:
Recording Industry Association Of America
1330 Connecticut Ave. NW
Suite 300
Washington DC 20036


RIAA fax: 202 775-7233
RIAA phone: 202-775- 0101


Let the f**kers know how you feel!!
BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS! BAN THE BASTARDS!

jusedawg  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 1:07 PM
Check this out!

Next they will be trying to sue Google!
They might as well try and sue Microsoft too, but then again, Microsoft would probably kick their ass!

http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000 360.html

krispie1978  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 1:27 PM
Great Article. I just wish everyone would support the boycott.

cholera  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 2:00 PM
I will TOTALLY support this boycott. I think a year should be adequate enough to get the point across, but if not, so be it. It can continue until they surrender, or go under. It makes no difference to me which comes first. We must be heard..

Exhumator  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 2:07 PM
2 - jusedawg. They WON'T be sueing Google or M$. What they are trying to do is to ruin some students' life and make an example for others this way.

jusedawg  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 2:46 PM
Hey guys I have created a new sticker/logo. Let me know if you want the psd file to send for printing.

http://www.psprint.com has great prices.

I am going to be printing some up and sticking them evry where I go!

BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS/BAN THE BASTARDS!

http://www.voltageconsulting.com/images/boyco tt-riaa.jpg

jusedawg  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 2:47 PM
http://www.voltageconsulting.com/images/boycott-riaa.jpg

Meehowski  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 4:36 PM
Q.I.D.


This is the truth: I have NOT bought a CD in 3 years!!!!!!!!!!!!

I support ALL anti-R.I.A.A. efforts.

Be well.........

Jogey  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 5:37 PM
These fuckers can rot in hell.
I haven't bought a single CD since I was about 8 or so, I'm 15 now. I mainly didn't buy CDs because they were so expensive, but now I realize that the RIAA just wants money, I'm never buying CDs again. Burning CDs is the way I'm going.

If any of you get busted on file sharing, counter-sue for invasion of privacy.

Ramamageesh2003  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 5:48 PM
You know, I read in another post that fees are added to the cost of blank media that goes to the RIAA et al for royalties.

If that's the case, then downloading files and copying them to CD's should not necessarily be cut and dry copyright infringement, as the RIAA IS getting paid via the royalties from the blank media. To justify it further, the blank media is taxed regardless of its use. If I copy some pictures of my family to the CD, the RIAA gets paid. Why? What monetary compensation are they entitled to with respect to MY pictures?
It seems that they realized that they, in fact, dropped the ball and should have also asked for a tax to be put in place on HARD DRIVES (assuming that this isn't already in place) making the same assumptions that we as consumers will use the drives to store copyrighted material.

With this in mind let me propose the following potential solution: download music from the net and burn it to CD's. They've already been paid to some extent via the blank media taxes. That should count for something, shouldn't it? A copy is, after all, a copy and you shouldn't be FINED full price for a copy.

Do you know why there haven't been any cars manufactured that will run on tap water? Because the members of OPEC would have them killed (or neutralized if you work for the CIA). The same thing is going on here with the RIAA clinging to their outdated business model. The internet takes them completely out of the picture and makes us, the consumers, the "manufacturers" of the artist's material. Good luck in your new carrers RIAA members because it's only a matter of time.

Idontcareican  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 8:53 PM
Im just wondering what they are going to do about servers in Europe and Asia. Are Americans going to be the only ones who can not take advantage of technologies? Am I never going to need another hard drive in my life now? Do I really need a cable connection to "chat" and e-mail? Where is the information in the information age? CNNs web site? All I can say is they dont know what they are doing it seems.

dook  
Date: July 18, 2003 @ 11:56 PM
Ramamageesh2003,
In 1980 a guy did invint an engine that ran on water. No kidding! OPEC did actually buy the patten for it from the inventor. Research it if you dont belive me. But yes its all about controll from the RIAA scum.

viperpa33s  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 2:29 PM
I haven't bought a music cd for about 4 years now. Wonders if the so called RIAA (cringes at that name) will sue to force me to buy cds *shrugs*

If everyone started what me and a few other people started doing a long time ago, the RIAA and musicians who support it would of been on there knees begging.

inlivingcolour  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 5:23 PM
Buy a cd, get punished. Don't buy a cd, get punished. How ridiculous.

inlivingcolour  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 5:24 PM
I mean that they rip you off when you buy an album and they threaten to sue, or will subpoena or sue you for not buying a cd.

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:31 PM

FUCK YOU RIAA ILL KILL U WITH MY OWN VIRUS AND HACK YOUR ASS AND KILL YOU IF YOU COME SEE ME CUNT

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:31 PM

FUCK YOU RIAA ILL KILL U WITH MY OWN VIRUS AND HACK YOUR ASS AND KILL YOU IF YOU COME SEE ME CUNT

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:33 PM
 FUCK YOU RIAA 

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:34 PM
%

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:34 PM
%

FUCKOFFIRIAA  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:34 PM


scayf  
Date: July 19, 2003 @ 11:39 PM
I've refused to buy a new CD for about six months now...the ones previously purchased (as a BMG member *urp*) were only at the "buy 1 get 3 free" type sales. I've ripped every one of the 100 or so discs I had, and add to my collection via (insert yout favorite p2p here). My son, a musician, calls me a pirate (even after I gave him all my CDs...ingrate!) and "asked" that I take his tunes off my HD (tho I still have 'em). I love music. I will continue to DL music. But I won't buy another CD, and I don't listen to the radio (my car doesn't even have one), and only go to live performances. And, as I said before...

Fuque the RIAA.

CodeWarrior  
Date: July 20, 2003 @ 11:29 AM
and while we are adding names...let's not forget the slimy bot makers that are doing the dirty work, companies like BayTSP,Ranger Inc, and all the rest. They are trying to hide who is associated with them, but they will probably be identified in these first cases during discovery.
BOYCOTT THE BASTARDS! BAN THE BASTARDS!

bemanisuperstar  
Date: July 20, 2003 @ 4:36 PM
Best thing to do is buy Import music