|
A Wary Eye on Sites for Music Sharing
By NEIL STRAUSS
Published: January 1, 2004
OS ANGELES, Dec. 31 — The last year has seen an explosion of pay music-downloading services. Some have been successes, like Apple's iTunes Music Store, with 1.5 million downloads a week. Others, like BuyMusic, are plagued by complaints from users. But there is another site that has iTunes Music Store and BuyMusic beat: Easy Music Download, which has a greater profit margin than iTunes Music Store and probably a greater percentage of dissatisfied users than BuyMusic.
Advertisement
On its Web site, Easy Music Download offers unlimited downloads from a catalog of more than 700,000 songs for an annual fee of $21.95. Theoretically, one could own tens of thousands of songs for the same price as just 22 tracks from the iTunes store. If it sounds too good to be true, that's because it is.
"When everything hit the fan about people being charged for illegal music found on their machines, that was just the get-up-and-go I needed to fork out the cash for the files I wanted," Angela Tennant, a 25-year-old student from South Carolina who subscribed to Easy Music Download, said in an interview conducted via e-mail. "I just ended up paying up to the wrong people, and now I'm just aggravated, downright jaded, and it won't happen again."
What Ms. Tennant and others found when they subscribed to Easy Download Music was not a song-selling service at all, but merely information on how to download file-sharing services like Kazaa, which provide access to the unrestricted swapping that Ms. Tennant was hoping to avoid.
Roderick Dorman, chief litigation counsel for Sharman Networks, which owns the Kazaa Media Desktop, said that Easy Download Music was issued a cease-and-desist letter.
Many of the services state in their terms of service that the subscription pays for recommendations and technical support for free, easily available software. Easy Music Download is not alone in this market: at least a dozen other sites, like mp3perfect.com, mp3entertainment .com, mp3downloadhq.com and my-free-music.com, also sell access and help with free file-sharing services. All these sites look similar, and some have even copied text from other sites. But they vary in the extent to which they inform customers about the service they provide: some are designed to look like legitimate subscription-music services while others clearly state upfront that subscribers are paying for information and assistance only.
"Since August of 2003 we've been identifying what we view as scam sites, which are trading on the technology and offerings of Sharman Networks and in our view defrauding consumers by failing to disclose the actual service they provide," Mr. Dorman said. Several other cease-and-desist letters had been sent, he said, and he is "exploring with governmental authorities whether the conduct of these sites is criminal and is the appropriate subject of criminal law enforcement."
Through an e-mail address provided by an Internet consultant who did not want to be identified, the owner of Easy Music Download was reached. He identified himself as Ganesh Singh, and said he was from Hyderabad, India. "We tell people our Web site shows how to use file-sharing software," he wrote. "Other Web sites do not, so they are misleading." He declined to say how many users Easy Music Download has.
To learn more about these sites and their intended purpose, e-mail messages were sent and phone calls made to the owners of seven similar sites. Most e-mail messages remain unanswered; at mp3perfect.com, a flustered man answered the phone, listened to the questions, and said his superior should answer them. But his superior never called back.
The seventh e-mail message led to a telephone interview with a 25-year-old woman from Florida, who owns the subscription services imusicshare.com and mp3run .com. Speaking on condition of anonymity, she provided some perspective on the Web sites.
She said that she worked at an Internet billing company, and conceived of her file-sharing-support sites when she noticed that such sites did well financially. She started iMusicShare three months ago, she said, and gets 20 to 30 new subscribers a day.
That site is not meant to be at all misleading, she said. "It's for people who have no clue what to do on the Web as far as downloading," she continued. "They don't know what to do and how to begin, so they're willing to pay for help."
So the service provides subscribers with links to download free programs like WinMX and iMesh, supplies them with user guides to these programs, and gives 24-hour technical support, which few file-sharing services offer reliably.
She said that about 15 percent of her imusicshare subscribers request refunds. It is in a company's best interest to keep refunds and complaints to a minimum, she said, because they will affect a merchant's online reliability rating. "I think that there are a lot of people out there who really depend on us," she said. "There are people who are 70 and 90, and have no clue how to download."
Depending on one's perspective, sites like Easy Music Download are angels of file-sharing mercy, providing an easy way for Internet neophytes to navigate the morass of song- and movie-swapping sites, or they are clever parasites, feeding off the good intentions of those wishing to pay for their music.
One result for those who hold the latter view is that the services may be driving people back to Kazaa. "Web sites like easymusicdownload .com make honest people feel as if they are punished for trying to do the right thing," Ms. Tennant said. "And how have I gotten my music since I have been scammed? Let's just say I don't risk being hung out to dry anymore.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Full Story :
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/01/arts/01DOWN.html?ex=1073538000&en=685c6953f36e2eda&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
User Comments
(These do not necessarily reflect the beliefs of this site)
|
DeadMan2003
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 9:01 AM
If people are dumb enough to pay for this stuff it's their own fault. Maybe they should speak to some computer friends who know a bit about this. Mind you I know a friend who paid to get software to turn of the messenger spam when all he had to do was phone me and ask how. |
|
goldenpi
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 9:11 AM
I conclude that these sites are mostly scams and possibly illegal, but they are bad for the RIAA so that makes them allright :-) They all have big "sue me" targets through. |
|
ashleighj
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 11:46 AM
so what if they're bad for the RIAA? they're scamming (or at the best, misleading) the average music-loving consumer -- they're no better than our "friends" at the 5 major labels. |
|
fjones987
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 11:49 AM
They're attempting to charge for free information, it's like trying to sell water for a 100 bucks a bottle in the desert just because they can extort you. www.slyck.com gives you all the information you need on P2P services FOR FREE. These guys are trying to sell a subscription to give you links to this crap? Criminal, and illegal. Sue them. |
|
gdZiemann
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 1:19 PM
Underestimating the intelligence of Americans for profit is a 400 year-old-game. |
|
FewerInhibit...
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 1:36 PM
The folks that are getting scammed are the greedy, want it for cheap or free types. In all scams, the most taken in are the most greedy.
I see nothing wrong with offering information at a price, even if it is free elsewhere. Lawyers do it all the time, and you can go to almost any library and get that info for free.
These folks for the most part saw a way to get around the "buck a song" fees and learned a lesson hopefully. |
|
b1
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 2:08 PM
http://www.zeropaid.com/
http://www.slyck.com/rookie.php
http://www.unitethecows.com/ |
|
compmore
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 3:21 PM
it's not greed. People want to spend less to get more, it's human nature. If you went to the store and saw a two liter of Coke (could be Pepsi for all you Pepsi fans) for 1.50 and went to another store and saw the same two liter for .99 cents which one would you buy? People don't question the legality of the product when It's on the shelf. they assume it's ok to buy. That same conditioning goes for the internet.
If it's on a website (IE store) then it has to be legit right? The problem isn't greed, it's a lack of education. the general public doesn't know any better. The internet age is still new and confusing to the vast majority of people. Humans work with what they know. They problem with music is that there is no or little price difference in "legit" (I put that in quotes) music for sale online. Legit as far as the RIAA is concerned. |
|
independentm...
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 9:53 PM
When you have prohibition, crap like this flourishes. Why are drugs such a problem? Because they are illegal. Why did the mafia and moonshining become so strong in the early part of the past century? When you allow the RIAA to run rampant, expect more and more of this sorta thing.
Shmoo, of Electric Gypsy
Support Local and Independent Music! |
|
koemoejoe
|
Date: January 1, 2004 @ 11:33 PM
i say it's vary much not illeagal it happins every day------almost every e-book about how the internet works or how about internet for dummies??????
the whole dummies line would be illeagal
becose thats all that line of books does is give out info you can get for free ela ware to all you folks who think these folks are being mislead yea maybe......but artent we all in some way or another but misleading is what makes this contrey thrive would thair be a market for diat pills if not for misleading? would thair be a market for riaa music if not for misleading lmao would thair be a market for fastfood if not for misleading? would thair even be a market for the news is not for misleading
yes the u.s.a public gets screwed on a constent bases the only thing i can tell you is get informed it's the publics choice to do what thay tell you and stay in the dark about almost every thing
it seems the public went from the 60s whare thay protested about the guv screwing the public to well we tryed and gave up bye the 70s hummm and then whats even worse thay told thair kids not to even bother or try to inform them it's just sad really................................. |
|
dave109100
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 1:18 AM
"Underestimating the intelligence of Americans for profit is a 400 year-old-game."
Ever see those auctions on ebay that sell information of how to get something for $10.00 scam? |
|
goldenpi
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 5:38 AM
Frequently. They often have bids. Im not sure if thats just stupid idders or if the sellers are bidding on another account to give their auctions the appearence of popularity. |
|
wet1
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 8:29 AM
This is not the only place that does such. Another is labdv.com who wants money to access d/ls of dvd software. The same software is a sourceforge development that can be gotten from the sourceforge site for free.
These are outright scams, cloaked in grey areas, as best as the site owners can disguise it. Sooner or later they will find the attention of the legal forces as they continue to claim money for free products.
koemoejoe makes mention of the "for dummies" books. I tried one once only to find that it left me hanging by not covering the subject well enough to get me through what I needed to do. The same info was available in greater detail from within the help files of the program.
|
|
BrandonH
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 10:41 AM
The RIAA won't like this because it would offer competition to ripping off the consumer. |
|
EnforcerPSU
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 10:41 AM
the internet is full of scams. I am not surprised this is happening.
People who buy the dummy books really do need help, but the creators of these sites know that people dont want to get sued and are duping people into paying for something that sounds safe. |
|
goldenpi
|
Date: January 2, 2004 @ 2:35 PM
The RIAA wont like them. Neither will the p2p devlopers. I imagine sherman will aggressively shut down any offering Kazaa Light, and a few of the other propritary networks might as well. The RIAA could, but will most likely use most of its resources on the real networks and sue 'em all campaign. |
|
markmit
|
Date: December 31, 2004 @ 1:30 PM
Spectacular, I have just been duped. Funnily enough, in response to the insistance of Mr Singh, I was not under the impression that I was joining a peer-to-peer helpline, It was only after the website had me install MP3-Xtreme that I saw through it. A quick google (coincedentally where I found EasyMusicDownload.com) led me to this site.
Lovely! |
|
|