|
Rogues
Gallery-Cary Sherman
Cary
Sherman is the RIAA's general counsel. He shows up at major RIAA litigation
(usually for file sharing cases) for photo ops and to make Saddam Hussein
like claims that they have won their case, when, in fact they haven't.
Funny thing is that they have not won a single filesharing case yet. That's
right folks. We're a couple of years into the litigation and they have
yet to win a single case against file sharing companies. One tactic they
keep trying is to claim that they own the copyrights, when they don't
they are assigned to the labels.This is a huge difference. This is a very
important issue. If the court accepts their claims, then the artists become
employees of the label, and they can never get their masters back. This
is why in the MP3.Com case the artists whose work was infringed (according
to the judge) file an amicus brief on behalf of MP3.Com. Same thing in
the Napster case. The Recording
Artists Coalition filed an amicus brief on behalf of Napster. Why
would they? To protect their rights as artists, to prevent the labels
from ripping them off as they have for years.
In
the MP3.Com case they had a clear win, but decided to settle when MP3.Com
said they would challenge the ownship of the copyrights. Now in the Napster
case, two days after Judge Patel said she would allow Napster to investigate
the copyright issues, the RIAA and the labels (except for EMI) asked
the judge for a 30 day suspension of their lawsuit. This is a case
that the labels have spent 2 years persuing, have spent millions of dollars
to litigate, and they ask for a suspension? Once again the tactics have
failed, and the RIAA has shown it's true colors. This may play right into
the Dept. of Justice Antitrust investigation. What are you trying to hide
Mr Sherman?
|